Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Heart Failure
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Heart Failure. 2009;2:233-242
Published online before print March 25, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.806125
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/3/233    most recent
CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.806125v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duncker, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by van der Velden, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duncker, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by van der Velden, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Contractile function
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Heart failure - basic studies
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction

Original Articles

Prevention of Myofilament Dysfunction by β-Blocker Therapy in Postinfarct Remodeling

Dirk J. Duncker, MD, PhD; Nicky M. Boontje, BSc; Daphne Merkus, PhD; Amanda Versteilen, PhD; Judith Krysiak, PhD; Giulia Mearini, PhD; Ali El-Armouche, MD; Vincent J. de Beer, MSc; Jos M.J. Lamers, PhD; Lucie Carrier, PhD; Lori A. Walker, PhD; Wolfgang A. Linke, PhD; Ger J.M. Stienen, PhD and Jolanda van der Velden, PhD

From the Experimental Cardiology (D.J.D., D.M., V.J.B.), Thoraxcenter, and Department of Biochemistry (J.M.J.L.), Cardiovascular Research School COEUR, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Laboratory for Physiology (N.M.B., A.V., G.J.M.S. J.V.), Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Physiology and Biophysics Unit (J.K., W.A.L.), University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology (G.M., A.E.A., L.C.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Inserm U582 (L.C.), Inserm U974-CNRS UMR 7215, UPMC University of Paris, Paris, France; and Department of Medicine (L.A.W.), Section of Cardiology, University of Colorado, Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colo.

Correspondence to Jolanda van der Velden, PhD, Laboratory for Physiology, VUmc, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail j.vandervelden{at}vumc.nl

Received July 10, 2008; accepted February 23, 2009.

Background— Myofilament contractility of individual cardiomyocytes is depressed in remote noninfarcted myocardium and contributes to global left ventricular pump dysfunction after myocardial infarction (MI). Here, we investigated whether β-blocker therapy could restore myofilament contractility.

Methods and Results— In pigs with a MI induced by ligation of the left circumflex coronary artery, β-blocker therapy (bisoprolol, MI+β) was initiated on the first day after MI. Remote left ventricular subendocardial biopsies were taken 3 weeks after sham or MI surgery. Isometric force was measured in single permeabilized cardiomyocytes. Maximal force (Fmax) was lower, whereas Ca2+ sensitivity was higher in untreated MI compared with sham (both P<0.05). The difference in Ca2+ sensitivity was abolished by treatment of cells with the β-adrenergic kinase, protein kinase A. β-blocker therapy partially reversed Fmax and Ca2+ sensitivity to sham values and significantly reduced passive force. Despite the lower myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity in MI+β compared with untreated myocardium, the protein kinase A induced reduction in Ca2+ sensitivity was largest in cardiomyocytes from myocardium treated with β-blockers. Phosphorylation of β-adrenergic target proteins (myosin binding protein C and troponin I) did not differ among groups, whereas myosin light chain 2 phosphorylation was reduced in MI, which coincided with increased expression of protein phosphatase 1. β-blockade fully restored the latter alterations and significantly reduced expression of protein phosphatase 2a.

Conclusions— β-blockade reversed myofilament dysfunction and enhanced myofilament responsiveness to protein kinase A in remote myocardium after MI. These effects likely contribute to the beneficial effects of β-blockade on global left ventricular function after MI.

Key Words: myocardial infarction • β-blockers • contractility • myofilament proteins • phosphatases


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE