Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Heart Failure
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Heart Failure. 2009;2:320-324
Published online before print May 14, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.839076
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/4/320    most recent
CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.839076v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gorodeski, E. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Starling, R. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gorodeski, E. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Starling, R. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology

Original Articles

Prognosis on Chronic Dobutamine or Milrinone Infusions for Stage D Heart Failure

Eiran Z. Gorodeski, MD, MPH; Eric C. Chu, BS; Jennifer R. Reese, BSN, RN; Mehdi H. Shishehbor, DO, MPH; Eileen Hsich, MD and Randall C. Starling, MD, MPH

From the Section of Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Medicine, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Correspondence to Randall C. Starling, MD, MPH, Cleveland Clinic, Heart and Vascular Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail starlir{at}ccf.org

Received November 26, 2008; accepted April 23, 2009.

Background— There are no published clinical trials comparing dobutamine with milrinone in outpatients with stage D heart failure on continuous inotropes.

Methods and Results— In a retrospective analysis of 112 inotrope-dependent patients with stage D heart failure who were not transplant candidates at enrollment, we investigated the relationship between choice of dobutamine or milrinone and mortality. Half the patients were on dobutamine (mean dose, 5.4±2.5 µg/kg per minute) and half on milrinone (mean dose, 0.4±0.2 µg/kg per minute). Those on dobutamine tended to be older (63 years old versus 54 years old), male (86% versus 79%), and fewer had implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (57% versus 74%). During a median follow-up time of 130 days (range, 2 to 2345 days), there were 85 deaths (76% of cohort) and 55 rehospitalizations. Use of dobutamine compared with milrinone was associated with higher all-cause mortality in an unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.52; P<0.03). However, this association was not significant after adjustment for baseline characteristics in the full cohort (N=112; HR, 0.99; 95% CI 0.5 to 1.97; P=0.98) or propensity-matched cohort (N=70; HR, 0.94; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.85; P=0.86).

Conclusions— In this single-center retrospective study, there were no mortality differences between chronic intravenous dobutamine or milrinone in patients with stage D heart failure being discharged from the hospital. The high mortality in this group selected for inotrope dependence warrants careful consideration of all options and priorities for further care.

Key Words: heart failure • inotropic agents • mortality


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE