Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Heart Failure
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on February 10, 2009

Circulation: Heart Failure. 2009
Published online before print February 10, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.807032
A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/2/90    most recent
CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.807032v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Georgiopoulou, V.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Georgiopoulou, V.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrowRelated Articles

Original Article

Digoxin Therapy Does Not Improve Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure on Contemporary Medical Therapy

Vasiliki Georgiopoulou; Andreas Kalogeropoulos; Grigorios Giamouzis; Syed Agha; Mohammad Rashad; Sana Waheed; Sonjoy Laskar; Andrew Smith and Javed Butler1

Emory University

1 E-mail: javed.butler{at}emory.edu

Background—The impact of digoxin on outcomes of advanced heart failure (HF) patients receiving optimal contemporary therapy is not known.

Methods and Results—We retrospectively reviewed data on 455 advanced HF patients referred for transplant evaluation (age 52±12years, ejection fraction 18.3±8%); 227 (49.9%) were on digoxin at baseline. Primary outcome was death (n=101), urgent transplantation (n=14), or ventricular assist device implantation (n=4); secondary outcomes included HF- and all-cause hospitalizations. Digoxin use was evaluated a) in the original cohort; b) in a propensity score matched subset (n=322); c) as time-dependent covariate; and d) after adjustment for Seattle Heart Failure Score (SHFS). Patients were on optimal therapy: angiotensin-II modulation 92.5%, beta-blockers 91.2%, aldosterone antagonists 45.6%; devices 71.0%. After a median of 27 months, 83/277 (36.6%) patients treated with digoxin vs. 36/228 (15.8%) without digoxin met primary outcome (HR 2.28, 95% CI, 1.51-3.43, P<0.001); this risk persisted in the matched subset (HR 1.73, 95% CI, 1.09-2.75, P=0.021) and with time-varying digoxin use (HR 2.05, 95% CI, 1.23-3.41, P=0.011). Digoxin was associated with higher risk among patients in sinus rhythm compared to atrial fibrillation. Digoxin was not associated with improvement in either all-cause or HF hospitalization rates. These results were similar across gender and race, and when adjusted for SHFS and renal function.

Conclusion—This study suggests that digoxin therapy may be of no benefit in advanced HF patients referred for cardiac transplantation who received optimal medical therapy. Treatment with digoxin should be used cautiously in such patients because of risk for adverse outcomes

Key Words: heart failure • digoxin • outcomes • prognosis


Related Articles

Digoxin: Quo Vadis?
John G.F. Cleland and Damien Cullington
Circ Heart Fail 2009 2: 81-85. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Digoxin Therapy Does Not Improve Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure on Contemporary Medical Therapy
Vasiliki V. Georgiopoulou, Andreas P. Kalogeropoulos, Grigorios Giamouzis, Syed A. Agha, Mohammad A. Rashad, Sana Waheed, Sonjoy Laskar, Andrew L. Smith, and Javed Butler
Circ Heart Fail 2009 2: 90-97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Heart FailHome page
J. G.F. Cleland and D. Cullington
Digoxin: Quo Vadis?
Circ Heart Fail, March 1, 2009; 2(2): 81 - 85.
[Full Text] [PDF]