This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schrier, R. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schrier, R. W. Related Collections Cardio-renal physiology/pathophysiology

Editorials

Blood Urea Nitrogen and Serum Creatinine

Not Married in Heart Failure

Robert W. Schrier, MD

From the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver.

Correspondence to Robert W. Schrier, MD, Professor of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 4200 East Ninth Ave B173, Biomedical Research Building Room 723, Denver, CO 80262. E-mail Robert.Schrier@uchsc.edu

Key Words: Editorials • renin–angiotensin system • neurohumoral axis • urea • vasopressins

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

Klein and colleagues¹ have retrospectively analyzed results derived from the prospective, randomized Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of Chronic Heart Failure (OPTIME-CHF) study and contribute an interesting article to this inaugural issue of Circulation: Heart Failure. Their analysis provides further evidence that the level of renal function in patients with worsening heart failure and impaired systolic function is an important predictor of rehospitalization for cardiovascular events and death within 60 days of discharge. Renal function was assessed at admission. Change during hospitalization was recorded for blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Estimated GFR was calculated with the 4-variable equation of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study, which depends on serum creatinine, age, and sex.² Of interest, the BUN on admission and change in BUN during the hospital stay (independent of the admission value) was a statistically better predictor of the 60-day death rate and days of rehospitalization than was estimated GFR. Because BUN is affected by protein intake, catabolism, and tubular reabsorption of urea, it is not as reliable an index of renal function as GFR. Thus, this observation by Klein et al¹ is of particular interest and deserves explanation.

Article p 25

Serum creatinine is freely filtered at the glomerulus, not reabsorbed, but undergoes tubular secretion. Thus, creatinine clearance exceeds inulin clearance, the gold standard for GFR. In contrast, urea is freely filtered, not secreted, but is reabsorbed by the renal tubules. This reabsorption of urea is . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Jessup and M. R. Costanzo Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 11, 2009; 54(7): 662 - 663. [Full Text] [PDF]