Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Heart Failure
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Heart Failure. 2008;1:63-71
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.772756
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katz, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katz, A. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other heart failure

Advances in Heart Failure

The "Modern" View of Heart Failure

How Did We Get Here?

Arnold M. Katz, MD

From the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Ct, and Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH.

Correspondence to Arnold M. Katz, MD, 1592 New Boston Rd, PO Box 1048, Norwich, VT 05055-1048. E-mail arnold.m.katz@dartmouth.edu

Key Words: congestive heart failure • history of medicine • hypertrophy


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


    Introduction
 
The inauguration of a new journal provides a unique opportunity to look back on the way that we arrived at our present state of understanding. In the case of heart failure, it is possible to trace a remarkable history that, for Western medicine, extends back to clinical descriptions collected in works attributed to Hippocrates in ancient Greece. Since the fifth century BCE, physicians and scientists have approached this clinical syndrome in at least 9 different ways (Table). The increasing rapidity with which these views have changed illustrates how new knowledge has narrowed the gap between clinical medicine and basic science.1


View this table:



 
Table. Changing Views of Heart Failure
 
The present article describes how our understanding of heart failure has evolved over the past 2500 years. Having been active in this area since the 1950s and having shared many reminiscences with my father, Louis N. Katz, who played an active role in academic cardiology between the 1920s and 1970s, I have included several personal insights about progress since the beginning of the 20th century.


    Heart Failure as a Clinical Syndrome
 
Patients with what may have been heart failure are described in ancient Greek and Roman texts, but edema, anasarca, and dyspnea, the most common clinical manifestations mentioned in early writings, have other causes. Difficulties in evaluating these clinical descriptions are due partly to lack of pathophysiological understanding of disease, which was then viewed as an imbalance between opposing humors (Figure 1).


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (48K):



 
Figure 1. Two views of the circulation. A, Galen’s view. Pneuma derived from air . . . [Full Text of this Article]

 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Ito, H. Akazawa, M. Tamagawa, K. Furukawa, W. Ogawa, N. Yasuda, Y. Kudo, C.-h. Liao, R. Yamamoto, T. Sato, et al.
PDK1 coordinates survival pathways and {beta}-adrenergic response in the heart
PNAS, May 26, 2009; 106(21): 8689 - 8694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]