Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Heart Failure
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Heart Failure. 2008;1:285-289
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.800185
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGee, E. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGee, E. C., Jr
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardio-renal physiology/pathophysiology
Right arrow CV surgery: valvular disease

Controversies in Heart Failure

Should Moderate or Greater Mitral Regurgitation Be Repaired in All Patients With LVEF <30%?

Surgery, Mitral Regurgitation, and Heart Failure: The Valves Are All Repairable But the Patients Are Not

Edwin C. McGee, Jr, MD

From the Bluhm Cardiovascular Institute, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, and Department of Surgery, Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.

Correspondence to Edwin C. McGee, Jr, MD, Heart Transplantation and Mechanical Assistance, Cardiac Surgery, 201 East Huron St, Suite 11-140, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail emcgee@nmh.org


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Despite advances in medical and surgical therapy, heart failure continues to be a formidable problem. More than 5 million individuals are affected by heart failure in the United States, and it is estimated that 550 000 new cases are diagnosed annually (www.americanheart.org). Advances have been made with medical therapy and cardiac resynchronization, but despite such measures, outcomes remain poor in individuals with advanced heart failure.1 Cardiac transplantation, the ultimate therapy for end-stage heart failure, is plagued by the limited supply of donor hearts and the need for lifelong immunosuppression. It remains, and will always be, a therapy that benefits, at best, only a few thousand individuals each year. Ventricular assist devices are improving but are still limited by problems such as infection and thromboembolism. Although several promising ventricular assist devices are in trial or recently approved, they are only available for those with the most advanced heart failure.2,3 For all intents and purposes the field of mechanical assistance remains, if not in its infancy, in its childhood.

Many patients once thought to need transplant can benefit from conventional surgery like bypass and valve repair. Mahon et al4 from the Cleveland Clinic demonstrated equivalent intermediate survival for transplant and conventional surgery in a group of patients initially referred for transplant. We have learned from the ventricular reconstruction literature that many patients with advanced cardiomyopathy can have excellent long-term survival after conventional surgery.5–7 Surgeons who frequently deal with ischemic cardiomyopathy now no longer focus on left ventricular function, but rather the degree . . . [Full Text of this Article]