Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Heart Failure
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation: Heart Failure. 2009;2:303-310
Published online before print May 14, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.828343
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v2,pe4)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/4/303    most recent
CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.828343v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barasch, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tracy, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barasch, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tracy, R. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Structure
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Epidemiology

Original Articles

Association Between Elevated Fibrosis Markers and Heart Failure in the Elderly

The Cardiovascular Health Study

Eddy Barasch, MD; John S. Gottdiener, MD; Gerard Aurigemma, MD; Dalane W. Kitzman, MD; Jing Han, PhD; Willem J. Kop, PhD and Russell P. Tracy, PhD

From the Department of Research and Education, St Francis Hospital/SUNY at Stony Brook (E.B., J.H.), Roslyn, NY; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, the University of Maryland Medical Systems (J.S.G., W.J.K.), Baltimore, Md; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Massachusetts (G.A.), Worcester, Mass; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Wake Forest University (D.W.K.), Winston-Salem, NC; and Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry Research, University of Vermont (R.P.T.), Burlington, Vt.

Correspondence to Eddy Barasch, MD, Department of Research and Education, St Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY 11576. E-mail eddy.barasch{at}chsli.org

Received October 16, 2008; accepted April 23, 2009.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background— Myocardial fibrosis reflects excess collagen deposition in the extracellular left ventricular matrix, which has been associated with heart failure (HF). No studies have addressed the relation between fibrosis biomarkers and HF in the elderly.

Methods and Results— Serum fibrosis markers were measured in 880 participants of the Cardiovascular Health Study (mean age 77±6 years, 48% women). Participants with systolic HF (n=131, left ventricular ejection fraction <55%) and those with diastolic HF (n=179, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥55%) were compared with controls (280 with cardiovascular risk factors, and 279 healthy individuals) using a nested case-control design. Fibrosis markers included carboxyl-terminal peptide of procollagen type I, carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I, and amino-terminal peptide of procollagen type III. Echocardiography was used to document systolic and diastolic function parameters. Analysis of variance and logistic regression analysis (per tertile odds ratios [OR]), adjusted by age, gender, race, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, baseline serum glucose, serum cystatin C, serum creatinine, C-reactive protein, any angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, spironolactone or any diuretic, NT-proBNP, and total bone mineral density were performed. Systolic HF was associated with significantly elevated carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (OR=2.6; 95% CI=1.2 to 5.7) and amino-terminal peptide of procollagen type III (OR=3.3; 95% CI=1.6 to 5.8), when adjusting for covariates. Associations of diastolic HF were significant for carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (OR=3.9; 95% CI=1.9 to 8.3) and amino-terminal peptide of procollagen type III (OR=2.7; 95% CI=1.4 to 5.4). HF was not associated with elevated carboxyl-terminal peptide of procollagen type I (P>0.10), and fibrosis markers did not significantly differ between HF with diastolic versus those with systolic dysfunction (P>0.10) whereas NT-proBNP mean values were higher in systolic heart failure than in diastolic heart failure (P<0.0001).

Conclusions— Fibrosis markers are significantly elevated in elderly individuals with diastolic or systolic HF. These associations remained significant when adjusting for covariates relevant to the aging process.

Key Words: heart failure • collagen • population


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Myocardial connective tissue plays an important role in defining and preserving normal myocardial architecture and function.1 Excess deposition of collagen in extracellular matrix can lead to increased myocardial stiffness and subsequently to cardiac hypertrophy and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. These pathological changes increase the risk of heart failure (HF) and provide an anatomic substrate for life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias.1,2 Type I and III collagens are the major fibrillar collagens in both normal and diseased myocardium.3,4 Both are synthesized as procollagens with a small amino terminal and a larger carboxy terminal propeptide. Serum markers of fibrosis reflecting collagen synthesis include carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PIP) and amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP), and degradation markers include carboxy-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CITP). Elevations in these fibrosis markers have been shown to reflect intramyocardial collagen turnover.5,6

Clinical Perspective on p 303

Increased collagen synthesis/degradation has been found in HF,5,6 but the effect of aging on myocardial fibrosis and the role of fibrosis in diastolic and systolic HF in the elderly has not been established. We, therefore, examined whether fibrosis markers (CITP, PIP, and PIIINP) are elevated in HF with systolic dysfunction versus HF with preserved systolic function, and examined whether previously defined predictors of HF7 mediate the relationship between fibrosis markers and HF. Because osteoporosis is common in the elderly and is associated with increases in fibrosis markers,8–10 we also examined the influence of bone mineral density on the relation between HF and fibrosis markers.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Participants and Study Design
The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) is a prospective, community-based, epidemiological observational study designed to assess cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes in individuals aged 65 years and older. The design and the rationale of the CHS have been published elsewhere.11 Briefly, 5201 participants aged 65 years and older were enrolled in 1989 and 1990, with an additional cohort of 687 ethnic minority participants enrolled in 1992 and 1993. Exclusion criteria were as follows: hospice treatment, wheel-chair bound in the home, and radiation or chemotherapy for cancer. For purposes of the present study, history of chronic liver disease or pulmonary disease were used as additional exclusion criteria to minimize confounding effects of these diseases on fibrosis markers. The baseline examination (1989–1990) included an extensive physical examination, 12-lead electrocardiography, spirometry, and echocardiography. Laboratory assessments included serum-chemistry tests, creatinine, cystatin C, oral glucose-tolerance testing, lipid profile, inflammatory markers. Prevalent coronary heart disease was considered if there was a clinical history of myocardial infarction, angina, coronary-artery bypass grafting, or angioplasty. Prevalent disease status was updated based on adjudicated incident events throughout the study.

Fibrosis markers were assessed in 880 participants, selected using a nested case-control design based on HF status of the total CHS cohort (N=5888). Assays for fibrosis markers were obtained in CHS year 5 (1992–1993; n= 638) or CHS year 9 (1996–1997; n= 242). All clinical and biochemistry measures were obtained at the same evaluation visit for each patient (CHS year 5 or 9) to ensure simultaneous assessments of fibrosis markers and covariates. The presence of HF, prevalent at the 1993 to 4 examination cycle or before, was determined by expert adjudication of clinical records, and updated to reflect clinical status in CHS year 9 (1996–1997).

Four groups were examined: (1) HF with systolic dysfunction (decreased LV ejection fraction [LVEF] <55%; n=131); (2) HF with preserved systolic function (LVEF ≥55%; n=179); (3) controls with cardiovascular disease risk factors but without HF (control; n=280); and (4) controls (healthy control) without HF, and also without hypertension, diabetes, or hypercholesterolemia (n=279). Prevalent cardiovascular risk factors in the control—cardiovascular risk factors group were based on the overall prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia in the CHS.

All echocardiograms were interpreted at a centralized core echocardiography laboratory (Georgetown University, Washington, DC). Qualitative LVEF was estimated based on echocardiographic data obtained either at the baseline CHS examination or at the point of care as abstracted from clinical records. LV mass was estimated by ECG using methods published elsewhere.12 Systolic HF was defined as HF with a documented LVEF <55%, and HF with preserved systolic function (diastolic HF) as a positive history of HF with a LVEF ≥55%.7

Determination of Plasma CITP, PIP, and PIIINP
Phlebotomy methods, blood processing, and handling of samples have been described previously.11 Aliquots were frozen at –70°C until analysis.

CITP was measured using the CITP RIA from Orion Diagnostica on serum samples. Intra- and inter-assay variability are 3.5% to 9.5% and 5.6% to 9.0%, respectively. The lower detection limit is 0.4 µg/L.

PIP was measured using an enzyme immunoassay kit (Takara Mirus Bio, Inc, Madison, WI). The assay range is 10 to 640 µg/L with a lower detection limit of 10 µg/L. Intra- and inter-assay CVs range from 4.5% to 7.4% and 4.3% to 6.3%, respectively.

PIIINP was determined by a coated-tube radioimmunoassay as described previously by Risteli et al,13 using commercial antisera specifically directed against the terminal amino terminal peptide (Orion Diagnostica, Finland). The interassay and intra-assay variations for determining PIIIP are both about 5%. The sensitivity (lower detection limit) is 1.5 ng/mL.

Bone Mineral Density
Total bone mineral density (head, left and right arm, left and right rib, left and right leg, thoracic spine, lumbar spine and pelvic) was measured in a subset of 273 participants as part of an ancillary study by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA;QDR 2000 or 2000+;Hologic, Inc, Bedford, Mass). Standardized positioning and utilization of QDR software was based on the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. Scans were read blindly at the University of California, San Francisco, reading center with Hologic software version 7.10.14

NT-proBNP
This biomarker was measured in serum collected in 1992–1993 from the main CHS and supplementary minority cohorts and measured on the Elecsys 2010 system (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Ind). The coefficient of variation for the NT-proBNP assay was 2% to 5% during the testing period, and the analytic measurement range for NT-proBNP was 5 to 35 000 pg/mL.

Covariates
Demographic, clinical, and laboratory covariates used in analyses were as follows: age, gender, race, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, myocardial revascularization, stroke or TIA, coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, total bone mineral density, baseline serum glucose, 2-hour glucose tolerance test, baseline serum insulin, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, serum creatinine, urine microalbumin, microalbumin/creatinine ratio, cystatin C, hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, fibrinogen, factor VII, NT-proBNP, and self report of current use of angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors, spironolactone, or any diuretics. To assure the reliability of medication taken, the medication inventory method has been used utilizing specially written computer program.15

The echocardiographic variables analyzed were LV diastolic dimension, LVEF, septal and posterior wall thickness, left atrial antero-posterior systolic diameter, end-systolic wall stress, peak early (E) and late (A) diastolic transmitral flow velocity, E/A.

Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±standard deviation or percentages. Biomarkers were not normally distributed and results are, therefore, presented as medians with interquartile ranges. Group comparisons were made using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests or ANOVA for continuous variables and {chi}2 test for dichotomous variables, using Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons. To adjust for effects of covariates, which were significant in Table 1, logistic regression methods were used and odd ratios per tertile were reported for each fibrosis marker, using HF status as outcome measure and the healthy control group as reference. Five logistic regression models were performed: model 1 unadjusted; model 2 adjusted for age, gender and race; model 3 adjusted for age, gender, race, and bone mineral density; model 4 adjusted for age, gender, race, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, baseline serum glucose, serum cystatin C, serum creatinine, CRP, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, spironolactone or any diuretic; and model 5: adjusted by age, gender, total cholesterol, triglycerides, diabetes, and hypertension.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Demographic, Clinical, and Biochemistry Variables by Study Group
 
Two-sided probability values are reported with P<0.05 considered as statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC).

The study was approved by the institutional review committees of the participating medical centers. The authors had full access to the data and take responsibility for its integrity. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects Characteristics
Table 1 shows demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables. Compared with the healthy control group, participants in the HF groups had higher prevalence of coronary heart disease, stroke, atrial fibrillation, and worse metabolic, renal, and inflammatory measures. Angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitors and diuretics were used more in the HF groups compared with both control groups, whereas the difference between participants with HF and controls in the use of potassium-sparing agents did not reach statistical significance.

The median and interquartile range of the fibrosis markers in the 4 analyzed groups are illustrated in the Figure 1 through 3GoGo.


Figure 1828343
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. The median values and interquartile range of PIP. No differences have been found among the 4 groups. In the Box-and-whisker plot, the central box represents the values from the lower to upper quartile (25 to 75 percentile). The middle line represents the median. The horizontal line extends from the minimum to the maximum value, excluding outside and far out values which are displayed as separate points.

 

Figure 2828343
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. The median values and interquartile range of CITP. Significant differences have been found among (a) healthy control group and diastolic HF, systolic HF and control group (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, and P=0.0006, respectively); (b) control group and diastolic HF and systolic HF (P<0.0001 for both).

 

Figure 3828343
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. The median values and interquartile range of PIIINP. Significant differences have been found among: (a) healthy control group and diastolic HF, systolic HF and control (P<0.0001 for all three); (b) control group and diastolic HF and systolic HF (P=0.0008 and P<0.0001, respectively).

 
Relationship between HF and Fibrosis Markers
CITP and PIIINP were significantly higher in both HF groups compared with both control groups (P<0.0001), whereas differences in PIP were not significant (P=0.40). No differences were found between systolic HF versus diastolic HF (P>0.20). Controls with CV disease had higher values of CITP (P=0.0006) and PIIINP (P<0.0001) than healthy controls.

In the multivariate adjusted logistic regression models, systolic HF was associated with increased presence of elevated CITP and PIIINP (odds ratios [OR]=2.6 and 2.9, respectively; Table 2). Diastolic HF was associated with increased prevalence of elevated CITP and PIIINP (OR per tertile=3.8 and 2.5, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Association Between Serum Fibrosis Biomarkers With Heart Failure Groups Analyzed by Tertiles
 
Association of Serum Fibrosis Markers With Age, Gender, and Race
No association was found between age and fibrosis markers in participants with systolic HF. Among individuals with diastolic HF, CITP was associated with age (r=0.15, P=0.05). Similar results were found for CITP in controls with cardiovascular risk factors (r=0.27, P<0.0001) and in healthy controls (r=0.19, P=0.001). PIP was associated with age in participants with diastolic HF (r=0.25, P=0.001), but not in other groups. PIIINP was weakly associated with age in the control group (r=0.12, P=0.04).

In systolic HF, men had higher PIIINP levels than women (5.3 µg/L versus 3.7 µg/L, P=0.0002) whereas, in diastolic HF, women had higher levels of PIP than men (419 µg/L versus 370 µg/L, P=0.03). The same relationships were maintained in controls, where PIP was also higher in women than in men (431 µg/L versus 380 µg/L, P=0.001), and serum levels of PIIINP were higher in men than in women (3.3 µg/L versus 2.9 µg/L, P=0.004). No gender differences in fibrosis markers were observed among healthy controls.

Differences between white versus black participants were observed only in the healthy control group: CITP and PIIINP were higher in black than in white participants (4.7 µg/L versus 4.1 µg/L, P=0.04 and 4.3 µg/L versus 3.5 µg/L, P=0.002, respectively).

Association of Fibrosis Markers With Echocardiographic Variables
Table 3 presents the echocardiographic variables analyzed and the comparison of their mean values between the 4 groups. In general, there was a modest correlation between the echo-Doppler variables and fibrosis markers. The strongest correlations were between PIP with LVEF (r=–0.22, P=0.007), CITP with interventricular septum diastolic thickness (r=0.23, P=0.01), and PIIINP with interventricular septum diastolic thickness (r=0.25, P=0.006) in the participants with diastolic heart failure. In the control group, PIIINP was associated with LA diameter (r=0.15, P=0.02). In the healthy control group, the only association was found between PIIINP with peak velocity of E wave (r=0.18, P=0.01), and in the participants with systolic heart failure, no association was found between fibrosis markers and the echo-Doppler parameters.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Echocardiographic Data of the Participants Population
 
Association of Fibrosis Markers With Renal Function, Inflammatory Markers, NT-proBNP, and Total Bone Mineral Density
Table 4 shows that CITP was associated with renal function measures, whereas PIP displayed weak inverse correlations with serum creatinine. In the multivariate adjusted model (age, gender, race, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, spironolactone, any diuretic, any angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor), the strongest association was found between CITP and cystatin C in both HF groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Correlation Coefficients of the Analyses Between Serum Biomarkers of Fibrosis and Renal Function Parameters and Inflammatory Markers
 
Inflammatory markers included CRP and fibrinogen (Table 4). In the systolic HF group, PIP was inversely correlated with CRP and fibrinogen, whereas other correlations were nonsignificant. In diastolic HF, PIP was inversely associated with CRP and PIIINP with fibrinogen. In the control group with cardiovascular risk factors, CITP was associated with fibrinogen, whereas in healthy controls, an inverse association was found between PIP and CRP, whereas CITP was positively associated with CRP and fibrinogen and PIIINP with CRP.

NT-proBNP was measured in 484 participants, and those with systolic heart failure had higher serum levels than those with diastolic heart failure (P<0.0001). Pearson’s correlation coefficients between NT-proBNP and serum level of PIP, CITP, and PIIINP were 0.11, 0.37, and 0.28, with P values 0.02 and <0.001 for the last 2 markers, respectively. The strongest correlations were found between NT-proBNP and CITP in diastolic heart failure and systolic heart failure groups (r=0.40, P<0.001 and r=0.41, P=0.001, respectively). The correlations remained significant when adjusting for covariates (age, sex, race, HF status, coronary heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, physical activity, and BMI).

Of all 3 markers evaluated, only CITP and PIIINP were associated with HF when adjusted for NT-proBNP (P=0.01 and 0.003, respectively).

There were significant differences in total bone mineral density between systolic HF and healthy controls (P=0.0002) and between healthy control and HF free control groups (P<0.0001). However, total bone mineral density, which was slightly increased in systolic HF group, was significantly correlated with CITP in these participants (r=0.47, P=0.007). No other significant associations between the total bone mineral density and fibrosis markers were found. Adjusting for bone mineral density did not affect the association of CITP and PIIINP with HF. Therefore, osteoporosis was not a confounding variable of this relationship and did to contribute to the increase in CITP and PIIINP in patients with HF.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The principal finding of this study is that serum markers of fibrosis (CITP and PIIINP) are associated with prevalent systolic and diastolic HF in community-dwelling elderly individuals. These associations remained significant even after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as bone mineral density and NT-proBNP.

The present observations are consistent with the hypothesis that enhanced collagen type I degradation plays a role in elderly with HF. Collagen type I constitutes the majority of the cardiac interstitium, but PIP—the serum marker of collagen type I—was not associated with HF in the present investigation. Although some studies have found associations between PIP and HF5,16–18 other studies have not.6,19,20 Cardiac aging is characterized by loss of myocytes, which could explain the accumulation of collagen in the ventricular walls.21 The structure of collagen is also changed with aging. In a pathoanatomic study, the perimysial and endomysial collagen type I fibers was found to be increased in number and thickness in older hearts.22 The present investigation found that the ratio of PIP/CITP that reflects collagen type I turnover was lower in participants with HF than healthy controls, which was primarily due to higher levels of CITP in those with HF. An explanation for specific increase in CITP and PIIINP might be that in the early phase of ventricular remodeling, adequately cross-linked type I collagen is increasingly degraded subsequently and replaced by poorly cross-linked type III collagen in ventricular remodeling, thereby leading to LV dilatation.19 Alternatively, our failure to find and association of PIP with HF may reflect an elderly population where the degradation of CITP prevails over its synthesis. A shift from type I to type III collagen synthesis has been demonstrated in nonhuman primate models of arterial hypertension.3,4

It is also possible that in our elderly population synthesis of type I collagen may have reached a plateau. In support of this is that PIP levels in our healthy control and control groups was much greater than that seen in normal individuals in other studies using the same method of measurement, and approximated that which was reported for diastolic HF including those with advanced diastolic dysfunction.18 Further research is needed into the dynamic changes of various components of the fibrosis process in progressive HF.

Systolic Versus Diastolic Heart Failure
In contrast to the serum levels of NT-proBNP, which differed between systolic heart failure and diastolic heart failure, collagen markers were similar in both types of HF. This finding was unanticipated because systolic HF is associated with a higher prevalence of coronary heart disease and prior myocardial revascularization than diastolic HF. Hence, we anticipated that systolic HF would be associated with higher burden of fibrosis. The participants with diastolic HF had a higher prevalence of hypertension than those with systolic HF, and a significant albeit modest correlation was found between CITP and PIIINP with interventricular septum diastolic thickness, implying that mechanisms related to the pathogenesis of arterial hypertension could lead to increased collagen synthesis and degradation. Although we did not evaluate functional class of HF in the CHS, a previous study of HF with low ejection fraction did not find an association between markers of collagen turnover and New York Heart Association functional class.23 Our findings support those of others24 in showing absent or weak correlations between PIIINP and echocardiographic variables.

Inflammation, Renal Dysfunction, Total Bone Mineral Density, and NT pro-BNP as Related to Fibrosis Markers
Inflammation is a plausible etiology-mediating fibrosis.25 An inverse association between PIP with fibrinogen and CRP, and between PIIINP with fibrinogen were observed in the HF groups, which has not been previously reported. The mechanisms of this finding require further investigation.

Decreases in renal function may decrease the clearance of biomarkers and confound the association between fibrosis markers and HF. We found that cystatin C, a sensitive marker of renal dysfunction in the elderly26 was associated only with CITP and PIIINP (Table 4) but not with PIP. Additionally, renal dysfunction could be mechanistically linked to increases in myocardial interstitial matrix formation, thereby promoting HF. However, in the present study, the relation of HF to fibrosis markers was independent of cystatin C.

No prior studies have addressed the potential confounding effect of bone tissue turnover on serum biomarkers level in HF in the elderly. Although the bones are one of the major contributors of CITP turnover, the only correlation was found between CITP and total bone mineral density, and that only in the participants with systolic HF. When total bone mineral density was included in a multivariate model next to age and gender (model 3, Table 2), it mildly diminished the strength of association between CITP with diastolic HF and between PIIINP with both types of HF, suggesting a minor impact of bone tissue turnover on serum degradation marker of collagen type I and synthesis of collagen type III. PIP levels were similar in the 4 study groups and did not enter in any model.

The association between NT-proBNP and fibrosis markers was significant even when adjusting for a large number of covariates including HF. This finding is not unexpected considering the relation between BNP and interstitial myocardial fibrosis.27,28 Importantly, in our study the association among CITP, PIIINP, and HF remained significant even when adjusting for NT-proBNP that further supports the hypothesis that collagen turnover markers are relevant to the pathophysiology of HF.

Limitations
Serum markers of fibrosis are not specific to the myocardial muscle. Participants with liver dysfunction or severe pulmonary dysfunction were excluded, and thus prominent causes of increased collagen synthesis and degradation were ruled out. Osteoporosis is another potential source of elevated collagen biomarker concentrations, particularly PIP. Although this elderly cohort is subject to osteoporosis, which can influence serum levels of fibrosis markers, adjustment for bone mineral density did not eliminate the associations of fibrosis markers with HF. However, bone mineral density measurements were available in a relatively small subset of the present cohort, and, therefore, the influence of total bone mineral density on fibrosis markers may have been underestimated.

Conclusions
This study shows that in an elderly community-dwelling population, increased collagen types I and III turnover, reflected in elevated serum level of CITP and PIIINP, is associated with both diastolic and systolic HF, independently of age, gender, race, total bone mineral density, NT-proBNP, and a large number of covariates. In contrast to NT-proBNP, none of the collagen turnover markers analyzed in this study was able to differentiate between diastolic and systolic HF.


    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

The research reported in this article was supported by contracts N01-HC-85079, N01-HC-85080, N01-HC-85081, N01-HC-85082, N01-HC-85083, N01-HC-85084, N01-HC-85085, N01-HC-85086, Georgetown Echo RC-HL35129, JHU MRI RC-HL15103, HL43201, and 1-T32-HL07902 from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, and by grant AG09556 from the National Institute of Aging. Also, partially supported by grants 1RO3AG23291 and R37AG18915.

Disclosures

None.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1. Weber KT, Sun Y, Tyagi SC, Cleutjens JPM. Collagen network of the myocardium: function, structural remodeling and regulatory mechanisms. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1994; 26: 271–292.[CrossRef]

2. Brilla CG. The cardiac structure-function relationship and the renin- aldosterone system in hypertension and heart failure. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1994; 9 (suppl 1): S2–S10.[Medline]

3. Weber KT, Janicki JS, Shroff SG, Pick R, Chen RM, Bashey RI. Collagen remodeling of the pressure-overloaded, hypertrophied nonhuman primate myocardium. Circ Res. 1988; 62: 757–765.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Pick R, Janicki JS, Weber KT. Myocardial fibrosis in nonhuman primate with pressure overload hypertrophy. Am J Pathol. 1989; 135: 771–781.[Abstract]

5. Izawa H, Murohara T, Nagata K, Isobe S, Asano H, Amano T, Ichihara S, Kato T, Ohshima S, Murase Y, Iino S, Obata K, Noda A, Okumura K, Yokota M. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism ameliorates left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis in mildly symptomatic patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a pilot study. Circulation. 2005; 112: 2940–2945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Schwartzkopff B, Fassbach M, Pelzer B, Brehm M, Strauer BE. Elevated serum markers of collagen degradation in patients with mild to moderate dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2002; 4: 439–434.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Gottdiener JS, Arnold AM, Aurigemma GP, Polak JF, Tracy RP, Kitzman DW, Gardin JM, Rutledge JE, Boineau RC. Predictors of congestive heart failure in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 1628–1637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Adami S, Bianchi G, Brandi ML, Giannini S, Ortolani S, DiMunno O, Frediani B, Rossini M; BONTURNO study group. Determinants of bone turnover markers in healthy premenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int. 2008; 82: 341–347.[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Byrjalsen I, Leeming DJ, Qvist P, Christiansen C, Karsdal MA. Bone turnover and bone collagen maturation in osteoporosis: effects of antiresorptive therapies. Osteoporos Int. 2008; 19: 339–348.[CrossRef][Medline]

10. Eastell R, Hannon RA. Biomarkers of bone health and osteoporosis risk. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008; 67: 157–162.[CrossRef][Medline]

11. Fried LP, Borhani NO, Enright P, Furberg CD, Gardin JM, Kronmal RA, Kuller LH, Manolio TA, Mittelmark MB, Newman A; for the CHS Collaborative Research group. The Cardiovascular Health Study; design and rationale. Ann Epidemiol. 1991; 1: 263–276.[Medline]

12. Gardin JM, Wong ND, Bommer W, Klopfenstein HS, Smith VE, Tabatznik B, Siscovick D, Lobodzinski S, Anton-Culver H, Manolio TA. Echocardiographic design of a multicenter investigation of free-living elderly subjects: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1992; 5: 63–72.[Medline]

13. Risteli J, Niemi S, Trivedi P, Maentausta O, Mowat AP, Risteli L. Rapid equilibrium radioimmunoassay for the amino-terminal propeptide of human type III procollagen. Clin Chem. 1988; 34: 715–718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Fried LF, Shlipak MG, Stehman-Breen C, Mittalhenkle A, Seliger S, Sarnak M, Robbins J, Siscovick D, Harris TB, Newman AB, Cauley JA. Kidney function predicts the rate of bone loss in older individuals: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006; 61: 743–748.[Medline]

15. Psaty BM, Lee M, Savage PJ, Rutan GH, German PS, Lyles M. Assessing the use of medications in the elderly: methods and initial experience in the Cardiovascular Health Study. The Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45: 683–692.[CrossRef][Medline]

16. Querejeta R, López B, González A, Sánchez E, Larman M, Martínez Ubago JL, Díez J. Increased collagen type I synthesis in patients with heart failure of hypertensive origin: relation to myocardial fibrosis. Circulation. 2004; 110: 1263–1268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. López B, González A, Beaumont J, Querejeta R, Larman M, Díez J. Identification of a potential cardiac antifibrotic mechanism of torasemide in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: 859–867.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Martos R, Baugh J, Ledwidge M, O'Loughlin C, Conlon C, Patle A, Donnelly SC, McDonald K. Diastolic heart failure: evidence of increased myocardial collagen turnover linked to diastolic dysfunction. Circulation. 2007; 115: 888–895.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Timonen P, Magga J, Risteli J, Punnonen K, Vanninen E, Turpeinen A, Tuomainen P, Kuusisto J, Vuolteenaho O, Peuhkurinen K. Cytokines, interstitial collagen and ventricular remodelling in dilated cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2008; 124: 293–300.[CrossRef][Medline]

20. Klappacher G, Franzen P, Haab D, Mehrabi M, Binder M, Plesch K, Pacher R, Grimm M, Pribill I, Eichler HG. Measuring extracellular matrix turnover in the serum of patients with idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and impact on diagnosis and prognosis. Am J Cardiol. 1995; 75: 913–918.[CrossRef][Medline]

21. de Souza RR. Aging of myocardial collagen. Biogerontology. 2002; 3: 325–335.[CrossRef][Medline]

22. Gazoti Denessa CR, Mesiano Maifrino LB, Rodrigues de Souza R. Age related changes of the collagen network of the human heart. Mech Ageing Dev. 2001; 122: 1049–1058.[CrossRef][Medline]

23. Cavallari LH, Groo VL, Momary KM, Stamos TD, Vaitkus PT. Markers of cardiac collagen turnover are similar in patients with mild and more severe symptoms of heart failure. Congest Heart Fail. 2007; 13: 275–279.[CrossRef][Medline]

24. Wang TJ, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Siwik DA, Safa R, Guo CY, Corey D, Sundstrom J, Sawyer DB, Colucci WS, Vasan RS. Clinical and echocardiographic correlates of plasma procollagen type III amino-terminal peptide levels in the community. Am Heart J. 2007; 154: 291–297.[CrossRef][Medline]

25. Weber KT. From inflammation to fibrosis: a stiff stretch of highway. Hypertension. 2004; 43: 716–719.[Free Full Text]

26. Shlipak MG, Sarnak MJ, Katz R, Fried LF, Seliger SL, Newman AB, Siscovick DS, Stehman-Breen C. Cystatin C and the risk of death and cardiovascular events among elderly persons. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 2049–2060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Ogawa Y, Tamura N, Chusho H, Nakao K. Brain natriuretic peptide appears to act locally as an antifibrotic factor in the heart. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2001; 79: 723–729.[CrossRef][Medline]

28. Cao L, Garner DC. Natriuretic peptides inhibit DNA synthesis in cardiac fibroblasts. Hypertension. 1995; 25: 227–234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

The prevalence of heart failure (HF) increases in the elderly. Myocardial fibrosis contributes from the anatomical, functional and clinical standpoints to left ventricular remodeling, electrical instability and HF, respectively. To determine the relation between serum fibrosis biomarkers and HF, we measured serum markers of collagen I and III synthesis (carboxyl-terminal peptide of procollagen type I, amino-terminal peptide of procollagen type III) and degradation (carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I) in 880 elderly individuals (131 with systolic HF, 179 with diastolic HF, 280 with cardiovascular risk factors, and 279 healthy) participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study. The serum level of fibrosis biomarkers was higher in HF than in control groups, whereas no difference was found between the 2 HF groups (P>0.10). In highly adjusted models for demographics, risk factors, medicines, total bone mineral density and NT-proBNP, carboxyl-terminal peptide of procollagen type I was not associated with HF whereas carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of procollagen type I and amino-terminal peptide of procollagen type III were strongly associated with both systolic and diastolic HF. The results of this study suggest an important role of these 2 biomarkers in the pathophysiology of HF. However, in contrast to NT-proBNP, carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of procollagen type I, and amino-terminal peptide of procollagen type III could not differentiate between diastolic and systolic HF, and therefore are not recommended for monitoring its progression in the elderly.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. A. Ezekowitz
A new pathway? Failure, fragility and fractures
Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2010; 31(1): 9 - 11.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v2,pe4)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/4/303    most recent
CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.828343v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barasch, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tracy, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barasch, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tracy, R. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Structure
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Epidemiology