Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Heart Failure
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on May 28, 2008

Circulation: Heart Failure. 2008
Published online before print May 28, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.107.743146
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1/2/91    most recent
CIRCHEARTFAILURE.107.743146v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henkel, D.
Right arrow Articles by Roger, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henkel, D.
Right arrow Articles by Roger, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Congestive
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrowRelated Article

Original Article

Death in Heart Failure: A Community Perspective

Danielle Henkel1; Margaret M. Redfield1; Susan Weston1; Yariv Gerber2 and Veronique Roger1,3

1 Mayo Clinic;
2 Tel Aviv University

3 E-mail: roger.veronique{at}mayo.edu

Background—Mortality in heart failure (HF) remains high but causes of death are incompletely defined. As HF is heterogeneous syndrome categorized according to ejection fraction (EF), the association between EF and causes of death is important, yet elusive.

Method and Results—Community subjects with HF were classified according to preserved (>50%) and reduced EF (<50%). Deaths were classified as coronary heart disease (CHD), other cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular. Among 1063 persons with HF, 45% had preserved EF with less cardiovascular risk factors and less coronary disease than those with reduced EF. At 5 years, survival was 45% (95% CI 43%-49%)and 43% of the deaths were non-cardiovascular. The leading cause of death in subjects with preserved EF was non-cardiovascular (49%) vs CHD (43%) for subjects with reduced EF. The proportion of cardiovascular deaths decreased from 69% in 1979-1984 to 40% in 1997-2002 (p=0.007) among subjects with preserved EF contrasting with a modest change among those with reduced EF (77% in to 64%, p=0.08). Advanced age, male sex, diabetes, smoking and kidney disease were associated with an increase risk of all cause and cardiovascular death. After adjustment, preserved EF was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death but not all cause death.

Conclusion—Community subjects with HF experience a persistently high mortality and a large proportion of deaths are non-cardiovascular. Subjects with preserved EF have less cardiovascular disease before death, are less likely to experience cardiovascular deaths than those with reduced EF and the proportion of cardiovascular deaths declined over time.

Key Words: epidemiology • heart failure • mortality • ejection fraction


Related Article

Does It Matter Why and How Patients With Heart Failure Die?: A Debate That Lives On
Paul J. Hauptman
Circ Heart Fail 2008 1: 89-90. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W.H. W. Tang and G. S. Francis
The Year in Heart Failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 11, 2008; 52(20): 1671 - 1678.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Heart FailHome page
P. J. Hauptman
Does It Matter Why and How Patients With Heart Failure Die?: A Debate That Lives On
Circ Heart Fail, July 1, 2008; 1(2): 89 - 90.
[Full Text] [PDF]