Skip to main content
  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Emerging Investigators
    • Advances in Heart Failure
    • On My Mind
    • Images and Case Reports in Heart Failure
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
      • Accepted Manuscripts
      • Revised Manuscripts
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Twitter

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Advanced search

Header Publisher Menu

  • American Heart Association
  • Science Volunteer
  • Warning Signs
  • Advanced Search
  • Donate

Circulation:
Heart Failure

  • My alerts
  • Sign In
  • Join

  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About this Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • General Statistics
    • Information for Advertisers
    • Author Reprints
    • Commercial Reprints
    • Customer Service and Ordering Information
  • All Issues
  • Subjects
    • All Subjects
    • Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Critical Care and Resuscitation
    • Epidemiology, Lifestyle, and Prevention
    • Genetics
    • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Imaging and Diagnostic Testing
    • Intervention, Surgery, Transplantation
    • Quality and Outcomes
    • Stroke
    • Vascular Disease
  • Browse Features
    • AHA Guidelines and Statements
    • Emerging Investigators
    • Advances in Heart Failure
    • On My Mind
    • Images and Case Reports in Heart Failure
  • Resources
    • Instructions for Authors
    • → Article Types
    • → General Preparation Instructions
    • → Research Guidelines
    • → How to Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Permissions and Rights Q&A
    • Submission Sites
    • AHA Journals RSS Feeds
    • International Users
    • AHA Newsroom
  • AHA Journals
    • AHA Journals Home
    • Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB)
    • Circulation
    • → Circ: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
    • → Circ: Genomic and Precision Medicine
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Interventions
    • → Circ: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
    • → Circ: Heart Failure
    • Circulation Research
    • Hypertension
    • Stroke
    • Journal of the American Heart Association
Original Article

Mechanistic Relationship Between Membrane Type-1 Matrix Metalloproteinase and the Myocardial Response to Pressure OverloadCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Michael R. Zile, Catalin F. Baicu, Robert E. Stroud, An O. Van Laer, Jeffrey A. Jones, Risha Patel, Rupak Mukherjee, Francis G. Spinale
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000984
Circulation: Heart Failure. 2014;7:340-350
Originally published March 18, 2014
Michael R. Zile
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (M.R.Z., C.F.B., A.O.V.L.) and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (R.E.S., J.A.J., R.P., R.M.), R.H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and W.J.B. Dorn Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia (F.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catalin F. Baicu
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (M.R.Z., C.F.B., A.O.V.L.) and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (R.E.S., J.A.J., R.P., R.M.), R.H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and W.J.B. Dorn Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia (F.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert E. Stroud
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (M.R.Z., C.F.B., A.O.V.L.) and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (R.E.S., J.A.J., R.P., R.M.), R.H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and W.J.B. Dorn Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia (F.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
An O. Van Laer
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (M.R.Z., C.F.B., A.O.V.L.) and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (R.E.S., J.A.J., R.P., R.M.), R.H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and W.J.B. Dorn Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia (F.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey A. Jones
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (M.R.Z., C.F.B., A.O.V.L.) and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (R.E.S., J.A.J., R.P., R.M.), R.H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and W.J.B. Dorn Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia (F.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Risha Patel
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (M.R.Z., C.F.B., A.O.V.L.) and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (R.E.S., J.A.J., R.P., R.M.), R.H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and W.J.B. Dorn Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia (F.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rupak Mukherjee
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (M.R.Z., C.F.B., A.O.V.L.) and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (R.E.S., J.A.J., R.P., R.M.), R.H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and W.J.B. Dorn Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia (F.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francis G. Spinale
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (M.R.Z., C.F.B., A.O.V.L.) and Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (R.E.S., J.A.J., R.P., R.M.), R.H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and W.J.B. Dorn Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia (F.G.S.).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Sources of Funding
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
Loading

Abstract

Background—Although matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) were initially thought to result primarily in extracellular matrix degradation, certain MMP types, such as membrane type-1 (MT1) MMP, may also be involved in profibrotic cascades through hydrolysis of latency-associated transforming growth factor–binding protein (LTBP-1) and activation of transforming growth factor–dependent profibrotic signaling. The present study tested the hypothesis that MT1-MMP plays a direct role in the matrix remodeling response to a left ventricular (LV) pressure overload (PO) stimulus.

Methods and Results—Wild-type (WT) and transgenic mice with cardiac-restricted MT1-MMP overexpression or MT1-MMP reduced expression underwent PO for 4 weeks. PO resulted in a 57% increase in LV mass (no change in LV end diastolic volume, resulting in an increase in the LV mass/volume ratio consistent with concentric remodeling), a 60% increase in MT1-MMP–mediated LTBP-1 hydrolysis and a 190% increase in collagen content in WT mice. Although LV mass was similar among WT, MT1-MMP overexpression, and MT1-MMP reduced expression after PO, significant differences in LV function, MT1-MMP–mediated LTBP-1 hydrolysis, and collagen content occurred. PO in MT1-MMP overexpression increased LTBP-1 hydrolysis (18%), collagen content (60%), and left atrial dimension (19%; indicative of LV diastolic dysfunction) when compared with WT. PO in MT1-MMP reduced expression reduced left atrial dimension (19%), LTBP-1 hydrolysis (40%), and collagen content (32%) when compared with both WT.

Conclusions—Despite an equivalent PO stimulus and magnitude of LV myocardial growth, altering MT1-MMP levels caused specific matrix-dependent changes in remodeling, thereby demonstrating a mechanistic role in the development of the maladaptive remodeling and myocardial fibrotic response to PO.

  • hypertrophy
  • left ventricular
  • matrix metalloproteinases

Introduction

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy represents an initial adaptive remodeling response to pressure overload (PO); however, chronic PO is a progressive process that commonly leads to adverse LV remodeling, including the development of myocardial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction.1–10 Studies that have examined potential causes for this maladaptive response have focused primarily on mechanisms that alter collagen synthesis.8–11 However, there is emerging evidence that suggests that proteolytic events, such as those mediated by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), may also contribute to the adverse extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling that occurs in PO.12–14 For example, our recent studies demonstrated that PO-induced temporal changes in LV structure and function were associated with a time-dependent increase in the induction, expression, and abundance of a unique membrane type-1 (MT1) MMP.1 These findings may seem to contradict the canonical notion that MMP proteolytic activity primarily results in collagen degradation; however, MMPs act on a diverse portfolio of structural proteins and signaling molecules.12,14,15 In particular, MT1-MMP may play a critical role in facilitating activation of profibrotic synthetic pathways that result in fibrosis.14 Previous in vitro studies showed that MT1-MMP can hydrolyze latency-associated transforming growth factor (TGF)–binding protein (LTBP-1) and release TGF β16. TGF is maintained in the ECM in an inactive form through its binding to the LTBPs. LTBP-1 has an MT1-MMP–specific hydrolytic site. Once released, TGF undergoes activation, binds to the TGF receptor, activates intracellular signaling pathways that include phosphorylation of SMAD2 (pSMAD2), pSMAD2 translocation to the nucleus, and an increase collagen expression.14 Thus, this MT1-MMP–dependent proteolytic activity provides 1 potential mechanism by which the PO causes activation of profibrotic synthetic pathways that result in fibrosis. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to test the hypothesis directly that MT1-MMP plays a mechanistic, cause, and effect role in the development of the maladaptive remodeling and myocardial fibrotic response to PO. This hypothesis was tested by altering MT1-MMP expression and abundance using transgenic mice that overexpress MT1-MMP and transgenic mice with reduced expression of MT1-MMP in a murine model of chronic PO created by transverse aortic constriction (TAC).

Clinical Perspective on p 350

Methods

Overview and Rationale

To determine whether and to what extent modulation in MT1-MMP abundance alters the myocardial response to PO, 2 transgenic mouse lines were created: MT1-MMP overexpression (OE) and MT1-MMP reduced expression (RE); Friend virus B-type (FVB) wild-type (WT) mice served as controls. PO was created in these 3 groups of mice using TAC (PO); mice that did not undergo TAC (non-PO) were also studied in all 3 groups. The experimental response variables were chosen for the following reasons: first, to demonstrate that the transgenic constructs resulted in a change in MT1-MMP activity and a change in MT1-MMP–dependent LTBP-1 hydrolytic potential; second, to determine whether changes in MT1-MMP activity resulted in the activation of profibrotic signaling changes in the pSMAD2/SMAD2 ratio and in collagen I A1 (Col1A1) and collagen III A1 (Col3A1) expression were assessed; third, to determine whether these changes in profibrotic signaling resulted in changes in LV structure, diastolic function, and ECM fibrillar collagen content; and fourth, to determine whether these changes in MT1-MMP, LV structure, and function altered survival rates.

Transgenic Mouse Models

Mice with myocardial-restricted expression of human MT1-MMP (MT1-OE) were developed on an FVB background by placing the full-length human gene sequence for MT1-MMP (GenBank 793762 accession no. 90925; 2369 bp) under the control of the α-myosin heavy chain promoter, as previously described.17 The presence of human MT1-MMP was confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using human-specific MT1-MMP primers. A stable, viable colony of this transgenic line was established. Mice born into this colony do not display any phenotypic or developmental abnormalities.

Mice with a global reduction in expression of MT1-MMP (MT1-RE) were developed on an FVB background by replacing exon 4 of the murine MT1-MMP gene sequence with a neomycin cassette by homologous recombination, as previously described.18,19 The global homozygous MT1-MMP knockout (-/-) animals display severe malformation and growth retardation and typically die around postnatal day 21. However, the heterozygous offspring has a 50% reduction in MT1-MMP gene copy number, resulting in a ≈50% reduction in protein levels. These heterozygous animals have a normal lifespan, do not display any overt phenotypic abnormalities, and produce offspring within the expected Mendelian ratios (1:2:1, +/+, +/-, -/-). Accordingly, heterozygous animals were used for the experiments outlined in this study. Heterozygosity was confirmed by RT-PCR and identified as having the presence of bands for both WT MT1-MMP and the neomycin gene on agarose gel electrophoresis. Fibroblast-specific and cardiomyocyte-specific cardiac-restricted conditional MT1-MMP knockout mice have not yet been created. Whether the homozygous form of these conditional cell-specific knockouts would have the same phenotype and limited survival as the global knockout is not known and should be the subject of future investigations.

Pressure Overload

The methods used to create TAC have been previously described.20 All mice were between 12 and 14 weeks of age at the time of PO. Mice were studied 4 weeks after PO. Twenty mice underwent PO in the WT and MT1-RE groups, and 40 mice underwent PO in the MT1-OE group. All PO mice had a minimum pressure gradient of 100 mm Hg across the TAC. Ten mice did not undergo TAC and served as non-PO controls in each of the 3 groups. In each group discussed above, equal numbers of male and female mice were assigned; thus, 50% of each group was male and 50% were female.

Echocardiography

Echocardiographic measurements were made using a 40 MHz mechanical scanning transducer (707B) and a Vevo 770 echocardiograph (VisualSonics, Inc, Toronto, Canada). LV dimension, volume, wall thickness, ejection fraction (EF), mass, and left atrial dimension (LAD) were measured using the American Society of Echocardiography criteria.21 LV mass was normalized to body weight. LAD was used to reflect chronic changes in LV diastolic pressure; LAD increases as a function of sustained increased LV diastolic pressure (ie, an integration of pressure over time).2,22,23 The aortic pressure gradient created by PO was measured using the modified Bernoulli equation: Pressure gradient=4(Vpeak)2, where Vpeak is the peak Doppler velocity across the TAC.1

Light Microscopy

Fibrillar collagen content was examined in LV myocardial sections (5-μm thick) stained with picrosirius red. A qualitative assessment of collagen content was made from birefringence light microscopy, and experimental groups were compared quantitatively based on collagen volume fraction (CVF), defined as the area stained by picrosirius red divided by the total area of interest.20,24 Fields with large blood vessels were excluded from the analysis. Areas examined were distributed throughout the myocardium from subendocardial to subepicardial and excluded the epicardial surface.

Cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area was measured using previously published techniques in the 6 groups of mice in the current study. Five cells in 10 random fields were measured in each mouse.

MT1-MMP Activity Assays

Myocardial MT1-MMP activity was directly measured in LV myocardium from each mouse using 2 MT1-MMP–specific quenched fluorogenic substrates previously described.25,26 One substrate, MMP-14 Substrate I (catalog no. 444258, Calbiochem), contained a peptide sequence representing a synthetic MT1-MMP–specific cleavage site.17,25,27 The second custom-designed substrate, SCJJ-1 (AnaSpec), contained a LTBP-1 peptide sequence representing an endogenous MT1-MMP–specific hydrolysis site.17,25 The LV myocardial extracts (50 μg) were incubated (37°C) in the presence and absence of each MT1-MMP substrate, and excitation/emission were recorded (328/400 nm for the synthetic MT1-MMP peptide, 340/485 nm for the endogenous LTBP-1 peptide FluoStar Galaxy; BMG Labtech) continuously for ≤20 hours and compared with a standard curve using active recombinant MT1-MMP.17,27 Several in vitro validation studies were previously performed to demonstrate the specificity of each MT1-MMP substrate.27

Immunoblot Studies for Protein Abundance

SMAD2 and pSMAD2 protein abundance were determined in LV myocardial samples from non-PO or 4-week PO WT, MT1-OE, and MT1-RE mice using previously published methods.27 LV samples were thawed and transferred to cold extraction/homogenization buffer (buffer volume: 1:6 [wt/vol]) containing 10 mmol/L cacodylic acid (pH 5.0), 0.15 mol/L NaCl, 10 mmol/L ZnCl2, 1.5 mmol/L NaN3, and 0.01% Triton X-100 (vol/vol) and homogenized. Ten micrograms of the supernatant were fractionated on a 4% to 12% bis-tris gradient gel. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (0.45 μm; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and incubated in antiserum corresponding to total SMAD2 and pSMAD2 (nos. 5339 and 3101, respectively; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA). Antisera were diluted in 5% nonfat dry milk-PBS. A secondary peroxidase-conjugated antibody was then applied (1:5000; 5% nonfat dry milk-PBS), and signals were detected with a chemiluminescent substrate (Western Lighting Chemiluminescence Reagent Plus, Perkin-Elmer). Band intensity was quantified using Gel-Pro Analyzer software (version 3.1.14; Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD) and reported as the percent change from the non-PO control homogenates.

Gene Expression Analysis

Changes in Col1A1 and Col3A1 expression were examined in all myocardial samples using a RT-PCR method.

RNA Isolation

Myocardial homogenates were subjected to RNA extraction (RNeasy Fibrous Tissue Mini Kit; Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and the quantity and quality of the RNA were determined (Experion Automated Electrophoresis System; Bio-Rad Laboratories) using previously published methods.17,27,28

Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed to generate cDNA (iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit; Bio-Rad Laboratories). The cDNA was amplified with gene-specific primer/probe sets (TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix: catalog no. 4364321; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using single-color RT-PCR (MyiQ; Bio-Rad Laboratories). The specific primer/probe sets (Applied Biosystems) were Col1A1 and Col3A1 (catalog nos. Mm00801666-g1 and Mm01254476-m1). Negative controls were run to verify the absence of genomic DNA contamination (reverse transcription control) and the absence of overall DNA contamination in the PCR system and working environment (template control). Results from RT-PCR methods are presented as % change from FVB WT non-PO control.

Statistical Analysis

Measurements were analyzed before (non-PO) and 4 weeks after PO in WT, MT1-OE, and MT1-RE mice using a 2-way ANOVA; if significant, pairwise comparisons were made using Tukey test to adjust for multiple comparisons. Survival curves were constructed using Kaplan–Meier probability estimates and survival at 4 weeks was compared using a χ2 analysis. In the current study, only total mortality was examined; cause of death was not examined. The relationships between MT1 activity, CVF, and left atrial diameter were assessed using a least squares liner regression analysis. Values of P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical procedures were performed using the STATA statistical software package (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Results are presented as mean±SEM. Final sample sizes for each protocol/experiment are indicated in the Table. The authors had full access to the data and take full responsibility for its integrity. All animal procedures were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table.

Effects of PO on Structure and Function in FVB (Wild-Type) Mice and MT1-MMP Transgenic Mice

Results

Survival

PO produced by TAC caused a 40% mortality rate in the WT mice, 12 of the 20 assigned to this group survived to the 4-week study point (Figure 1). Modulation of MT1-MMP abundance altered the response to PO. PO in the MT1-OE mice caused an 80% mortality rate (9 of the 40 assigned to this group survived to the 4-week study point), whereas PO in the MT1-RE mice caused a 20% mortality rate, 16 of the 20 assigned to this group survived to the 4-week study point (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Effects of chronic pressure overload (PO) on survival in Friend virus B-type (FVB) wild-type (WT) vs membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) overexpression (OE) vs MT1-MMP reduced expression (RE) mice. There was a markedly decreased survival rate in the MT1-OE mice (from 40 to 9) when compared with that in WT mice (from 20 to 12) but a small increase in survival in the MT1-RE mice (from 20 to 16). *P<0.05 vs FVB WT. Non-PO indicates mice that did not undergo transverse aortic constriction (10 in each group).

There were no mortalities in the non-PO control mice; all 10 assigned to each group survived to the 4-week study point. WT, MT1-OE, and MT1-RE mice that did not undergo TAC were followed for 4 weeks, from age 12 to 16 weeks. There were no mortalities in these 3 non-PO mice (Figure 1).

Structure and Function

LV structure, systolic function, and diastolic function data in the absence of PO (non-PO) and after 4 weeks of PO in WT, MT1-OE, and MT1-RE mice are presented in the Table. First, the results in the Table highlight the effects of PO on structure, function, and signaling. Second, the results highlight the effects of modulation of MT1-MMP abundance on the response to PO specifically by examining 3 comparisons: differences between FVB WT PO data (column 2 in the Table) versus MT1-OE PO data (column 4), FVB WT PO data (column 2) versus MT1-RE PO data (column 6), and MT1-OE PO data (column 4) versus MT1-RE PO data (column 6). All other additional statistical comparisons are presented in the Table.

Effects of PO

In WT mice, PO was associated with a 57% increase in LV mass, no change in LV end diastolic volume, and a 79% increase in the LV mass/volume ratio consistent with the development of concentric remodeling (Table). In addition, PO was associated with a slightly decreased EF (but EF did not fall below the normal range) and a 59% increase in LAD consistent with the development of diastolic dysfunction (Table).

Changes in cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area that resulted from PO and transgenic constructs closely paralleled changes in LV mass described above, indicating that the level of hypertrophy at the LV chamber level was based on the level of hypertrophy at the cellular level (Table).

Effects of Modulation of MT1-MMP Abundance

At baseline, in the absence of PO, MT1-OE resulted in small but significant changes in LV structure and function. MT1-OE mice had significantly increased LV mass, no change in LV end diastolic volume, increased LV mass/volume ratio, slightly decreased EF (but still within the normal range), and increased LAD when compared with WT mice (Table). By contrast, at baseline, in the absence of PO, MT1-RE resulted in no significant changes in LV structure or function when compared with WT mice (Table).

After 4 weeks of PO, there were some similarities and some differences in structure and function in the MT1-OE mice when compared with those in the WT mice. After 4 weeks of PO, the LV mass was similar in the MT1-OE mice versus WT mice. However, because PO caused an increase in LV end diastolic volume in MT1-OE (but not in WT), MT1-OE mice had a smaller LV mass/volume ratio than the WT mice (2.8±0.1 in WT PO versus 2.2±0.2 in MT1-OE-PO; P<0.001; Table). In addition, after 4 weeks of PO, EF was 30% lower in the MT1-OE mice versus WT mice. Finally, after 4 weeks of PO, LAD was 20% higher in the MT1-OE mice versus WT mice (Table).

By contrast, after 4 weeks of PO, LV structure and systolic function in the MT1-RE mice was similar to the WT mice, but both LV diastolic function and survival were less adversely affected in the MT1-RE mice than those in the WT mice. After 4 weeks of PO, LV mass, LV end diastolic volume, the LV mass/volume ratio, and EF were similar in the MT1-RE mice versus the WT mice (Table). In addition, after 4 weeks of PO, LAD was 20% smaller in the MT1-RE mice versus WT mice (Table).

MT1-MMP–Dependent Profibrotic Signaling

Effects of PO

In WT mice, PO was associated with a ≈60% increase in MT1-MMP activity, LTBP-1 peptide hydrolysis, and the pSMAD2/SMAD2 ratio (Figures 2–4).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Chronic pressure overload (PO) induced changes in membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) activity. A, Representative examples and (B) mean data in Friend virus B-type (FVB) wild-type (WT; n=10 non-PO, 12 PO) vs MT1-MMP overexpression (OE; n=10 non-PO, 9 PO) vs MT1-MMP reduced expression (RE; n=10 non-PO, 16 PO) mice. MT1-OE mice had an increase in MT1-MMP activity and abundance before (non-PO) and after PO when compared with those in WT mice. By contrast, the MT1-RE mice had a significantly lower MT1-MMP activity and abundance before PO and a significantly blunted increase in MT1-MMP activity and abundance after PO when compared with those in both WT and MT1-OE mice. *P<0.05 vs strain-matched non-PO control, +P<0.05 vs condition-matched FVB WT, #P<0.05 vs condition-matched MT1-OE. Non-PO indicates mice that did not undergo transverse aortic constriction.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Chronic pressure overload (PO) induced changes in latency-associated TGF-binding protein (LTBP-1) peptide hydrolytic potential. A, Representative examples and (B) mean data in Friend virus B-type (FVB) wild-type (WT; n=10 non-PO, 12 PO) vs membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) overexpression (OE; n=10 non-PO, 9 PO) vs MT1-MMP reduced expression (RE; n=10 non-PO, 16 PO) mice. MT1-OE mice had an increase in LTBP-1 peptide hydrolysis before and after PO when compared with that in WT mice. By contrast, the MT1-RE mice had a significantly lower LTBP-1 peptide hydrolysis before PO and a significantly blunted increase in LTBP-1 peptide hydrolysis after PO when compared with those in both WT and MT1-OE mice. *P<0.05 vs strain-matched non-PO control, +P<0.05 vs condition-matched FVB WT, #P<0.05 vs condition-matched MT1-OE. Non-PO indicates mice that did not undergo transverse aortic constriction.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Chronic pressure overload (PO) induced changes in the phosphorylation of SMAD2 (pSMAD2)/SMAD2 ratio. A, Representative examples (B) mean data in Friend virus B-type (FVB) wild-type (WT; n=10 non-PO, 12 PO) vs membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) overexpression (OE; n=10 non-PO, 9 PO) vs MT1-MMP reduced expression (RE; n=10 non-PO, 16 PO) mice. MT1-OE mice had an increase in the pSMAD2/SMAD2 ratio before and after PO when compared with that in WT mice. By contrast, the MT1-RE mice had a significantly lower pSMAD2/SMAD2 ratio before PO and a significantly blunted increase in the pSMAD2/SMAD2 ratio after PO when compared with those in both WT and MT1-OE mice. *P<0.05 vs strain-matched non-PO control, +P<0.05 vs condition-matched FVB WT, #P<0.05 vs condition-matched MT1-OE. Non-PO indicates mice that did not undergo transverse aortic constriction.

Effects of Modulation of MT1-MMP Abundance

At baseline, in the absence of PO, MT1-OE resulted in an increase in MT1-MMP activity, LTBP-1 peptide hydrolysis, and the pSMAD/SMAD2 ratio when compared with WT mice (Figures 2–4). By contrast, at baseline, in the absence of PO, MT1-RE mice had a lower MT1-MMP activity, LTBP-1 peptide hydrolysis, and pSMAD2/SMAD2 ratio when compared with WT mice (Figures 2–4).

After 4 weeks of PO, there was a more robust activation of MT1-MMP–dependent profibrotic signaling in MT1-OE mice when compared with that in the WT mice. After 4 weeks of PO, MT1-MMP activity and LTBP-1 peptide hydrolysis were 15% higher in the MT1-OE mice than those in the WT PO mice (Figures 2 and 3). In addition, after 4 weeks of PO, the pSMAD2/SMAD2 ratio was 115% higher in the MT1-OE mice than that in the WT PO mice (Figure 4). By contrast, after 4 weeks of PO, there was a less robust activation of MT1-MMP–dependent profibrotic signaling in MT1-RE mice when compared with that in the WT mice. After 4 weeks of PO, MT1-MMP activity and LTBP-1 peptide hydrolysis were 30% lower in the MT1-RE mice than those in the WT PO mice (Figures 2 and 3). In addition, after 4 weeks of PO, the pSMAD2/SMAD2 ratio was 25% lower in the MT1-RE mice than that in the WT PO mice (Figure 4).

Although changes in both SMAD2 and pSMAD2 occurred in these studies, the changes in the ratio were driven primarily by changes in pSMAD2 (Figure 4).

Collagen Expression and Content

Effects of PO

In WT mice, PO was associated with a 200% increase in Col1A1 expression, a 130% increase in Col3A1 expression, and a 190% increase in CVF when compared with those in WT PO mice (Figures 5 and 6).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Chronic pressure overload (PO) induced changes in collagen 1A1 (Col1A1; A) and collagen 3A1 (Col3A1; B) expression in Friend virus B-type (FVB) wild-type (WT; n=10 non-PO, 12 PO) vs membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) overexpression (OE; n=10 non-PO, 9 PO) vs MT1-MMP reduced expression (RE; n=10 non-PO, 16 PO) mice. MT1-MMP-OE mice had an increase in Col1A1 and Col3A1 before (non-PO) and after PO when compared with that in WT mice. By contrast, MT1-RE mice had a significantly lower Col1A1 and Col3A1 before PO and a significantly blunted increase in Col1A1 and Col3A1 after PO when compared with those in both WT and MT1-OE mice. *P<0.05 vs strain-matched non-PO control, +P<0.05 vs condition-matched FVB WT, #P<0.05 vs condition-matched MT1-OE. Non-PO indicates mice that did not undergo transverse aortic constriction.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Chronic pressure overload (PO) induced changes in collagen volume fraction (CVF). A, Representative examples and (B) mean data in Friend virus B-type (FVB) wild-type (WT; n=10 non-PO, 12 PO) vs membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) overexpression (OE; n=10 non-PO, 9 PO) vs MT1-MMP reduced expression (RE; n=10 non-PO, 16 PO) mice. MT1-MMP OE mice had an increase in CVF before (non-PO) and after PO when compared with that in WT mice. By contrast, MT1-RE mice had a significantly lower CVF before PO and a significantly blunted increase in CVF after PO when compared with those in both WT and MT1-OE mice. *P<0.05 vs strain-matched non-PO control, +P<0.05 vs condition-matched FVB WT, #P<0.05 vs condition-matched MT1-OE. Non-PO indicates mice that did not undergo transverse aortic constriction.

Effects of Modulation of MT1-MMP Abundance

At baseline, in the absence of PO, MT1-OE resulted in an increase in Col1A1 and Col3A1 expression and an increase in CVF when compared with those in WT mice (Figures 5 and 6). By contrast, in the absence of PO, MT1-RE resulted in a slightly lower Col1A1 and Col3A1 expression and a lower CVF when compared with those in WT mice (Figures 5 and 6).

After 4 weeks of PO, collagen expression was a more robust, and collagen content was larger in the MT1-OE mice when compared with that in the WT mice. After 4 weeks of PO, Col1A1 expression was 220% higher, Col3A1 expression was 250% higher, and CVF was 30% higher in the MT1-OE mice when compared with those in the WT mice (Figures 5 and 6). By contrast, after 4 weeks of PO, collagen expression was a less robust, and collagen content was smaller in the MT1-RE mice when compared with that in the WT mice. After 4 weeks of PO, Col1A1 expression was 275% lower, Col3A1 expression was 600% lower, and CVF was 40% lower in the MT1-OE mice when compared with those in the WT mice (Figured 5 and 6).

Relationships Between MT1-MMP and Structural, Functional, and Signaling End Points

There were direct significant relationships between MT1-MMP activity and left atrial diameter (Figure 7), CVF (Figure 7), and the pSMAD2/SMAD2 ratio. In each case, as MT1-MMP increased, left atrial diameter (r=0.62; P<0.001), CVF (r=0.63; P<0.001), and the pSMAD2/SMAD2 ratio (r=0.52; P<0.01) increased.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Relationships between membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) and structural, functional and signaling end points. There were direct significant relationships between MT1-MMP activity and left atrial (LA) diameter (individual mice [A] and mouse group data [B]), collagen volume fraction (individual mice [C] and mouse group data [D]). As MT1-MMP increased, LA diameter (r=0.62; P<0.001) and collagen volume fraction (r=0.63; P<0.001) is increased. Data from all animals were used to calculate the line of regression (A and C) and data are plotted as mean±SEM for each of the 6 groups of mice studied (B and D): Friend virus B-type (FVB) wild-type (WT; n=10 non-PO, 12 PO) vs MT1-MMP overexpression (OE; n=10 non-PO, 9 PO) vs MT1-MMP reduced expression (RE; n=10 non-PO, 16 PO) mice. Non-PO indicates mice that did not undergo transverse aortic constriction; and PO, mice that underwent transverse aortic constriction–induced pressure overload.

Discussion

The current study was designed to define the mechanism by which a specific MMP type, MT1-MMP, directly contributes to the profibrotic response, increased ECM accumulation, and progressive LV diastolic dysfunction that occurs in chronic PO. Transgenic mice that overexpress MT1-MMP or have reduced MT1-MMP expression underwent PO and yielded a number of novel findings that address this fundamental issue. First, PO was associated with MT1-MMP–dependent profibrotic signaling; PO caused MT1-MMP induction, increased MT1-MMP activity, MT1-MMP–specific LTBP-1 peptide hydrolytic potential, phosphorylation of SMAD2, collagen expression, collagen content, and resulted in diastolic dysfunction. Second, transgenic modulation of MT1-MMP abundance fundamentally changed this PO-induced MT1-MMP–dependent profibrotic signaling response but did not change the magnitude of the hypertrophic response to PO. MT1-OE markedly increased profibrotic signaling; whereas MT1-RE significantly decreased profibrotic signaling; but neither directional modulation of MT1-MMP altered the extent of PO-induced hypertrophy. Thus, the induction of a unique transmembrane proteolytic enzyme provides a fundamental mechanism that influences the myocardial response to PO. Specifically, there is a mechanistic relationship between the changes in MT1-MMP abundance and changes in ECM structure and LV diastolic function that occur during PO. In addition to these and other data underscoring the fact that MMPs have a diversity of both function and substrates, these data provide insight into the specific molecular pathways by which MT1-MMP induction contributes to the ECM remodeling and fibrosis that represent 1 critical event that occurs during the progression from chronic PO to diastolic dysfunction.

Mechanisms of Diastolic Dysfunction: Cellular Versus Extracellular Mechanisms

Abnormalities in diastolic function are consequent to changes in both the cardiomyocyte and the ECM.15,29–31 Cardiomyocyte abnormalities occur largely in the context of the development of LV hypertrophic growth. PO-induced increase in LV mass and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy have been thought to constitute an initial adaptive mechanism that normalizes or limits the increase in LV systolic wall stress that occurs in PO.32 However, progressive hypertrophy may become maladaptive and result in diastolic dysfunction.1 Unlike cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, ECM fibrosis is always maladaptive and results in diastolic dysfunction.8 These facts add to the complexity of defining which cellular and molecular mechanisms represent the causal mechanisms responsible for diastolic dysfunction in PO. Fortunately, modulation of MT1-MMP expression in the context of the current study did not alter the hypertrophic response to PO but selectively affected the ECM remodeling response to PO. Thus, MT1-MMP–dependent ECM remodeling represents an independent mechanism causing diastolic dysfunction. In the current study, the extent of diastolic dysfunction was assessed by examining changes in left atrial size. Left atrial size serves to integrate the increase in LV diastolic pressure over time. There were direct relationships among MT1-MMP activity and left atrial diameter, CVF, and mortality. As MT1-MMP increased, left atrial diameter, CVF, and mortality increased; the converse occurred when MT1-MMP abundance fell. Furthermore, the PO-induced diastolic dysfunction seems to be related to the activation of a TGF-dependent profibrotic signaling pathway. These data are concordant with human and animals studies that suggested that TGF-dependent profibrotic signaling is a consistent finding in chronic PO.3–38 In addition, the current study identified MT1-MMP as a critical factor in the activation of this signaling pathway beginning with MT1-MMP–dependent LTBP-1 proteolysis, TGF release, SMAD phosphorylation, and increased collagen synthesis.

MMP-Induced Proteolytic Versus Profibrotic Signaling

Data suggest that the pathways by which MT1-MMP contribute to adverse ECM remodeling likely include facilitating localized proteolysis of interstitial molecules directly (such as integrins) causing remodeling, amplification of active soluble MMPs (such as MMP-2) causing ECM instability and abnormal architecture, as well as through enhancing profibrotic signaling pathways (such as TGF-β) causing fibrosis.39–45 TGF-β is maintained in the ECM in an inactive form through its binding to the LTBP. LTBP-1 has an MT1-MMP–specific hydrolytic site. Through a number of in vitro and proteolytic assays, it has been demonstrated that MT1-MMP processes LTBP-1, which releases TGF-β.14,46–48 Once released, TGF-β undergoes activation, binds to the TGF receptor, activates intracellular signaling pathways that include pSMAD. pSMAD2 translocates to the nucleus and regulates transcription in a profibrotic manner, including an increase collagen expression.37,38 The TGF signaling pathway is complex, involves a number of different transmembrane receptors, a number of different SMAD proteins, and has both canonical and noncanonical components including TGF-β(TGFb-activated kinase 1)/TAK1/p-38 MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathway that play an important role in the maladaptive hypertrophy and dysfunction that develops with PO.49 It was beyond the purpose of this study to examine all of these components of TGF signaling pathway; however, data presented in the current study do indicate that PO activates a TGF-associated signaling pathway that is modulated by, if not actually initiated by MT1-MMP. Transgenic modulation of MT1-MMP altered these profibrotic signaling pathways; increased MT1-MMP increasing and decreased MT1-MMP decreasing TGF signaling.

MT1-MMP in Adverse Myocardial Remodeling

Previous studies have shown that the specific pattern of ECM remodeling and the functional changes that result from this remodeling are critically dependent on the type of hemodynamic overload present.14,15,32 The cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for these differences in ECM remodeling have not been completely defined. The current study and previous studies have attempted to define a differential pattern of selective MMP induction in pressure versus volume overload.14,15 The volume overload that follows a myocardial infarction leads to eccentric remodeling and increased expression and activity of MT1-MMP. Because the LV remodeling is distinctly different in PO when compared with that in volume overload, there is no a priori reason to think that the MT1-MMP/LTBP-1/TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathway would be activated in PO, at least not in the same fashion. However, data from the current study showed that the induction of MT1-MMP occur in both volume and PO.14,15 How do these different pathological stimuli lead to an increase in MT1-MMP and how does an increase in MT1-MMP play a cause and effect role in each form of LV remodeling? Although the current study does not address the entirety of this question, it does provide significant new insight into a number of possible answers. The different biophysical stimuli created in pressure versus PO result in an individualized portfolio of context-specific substrates. MT1-MMPs effect on these stimulus-dependent, context-specific, but different substrates results in distinctly different effects on collagen homeostasis and changes in LV structure and function.

For example, volume overload causes significant increases in LV diastolic volume and end diastolic wall stress with less pronounced changes in end systolic wall stress. In vivo and in vitro studies have shown that these changes in mechanical load are sufficient to increase MT1-MMP, MMP-2 (and other soluble MMPs), and a host of inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF).1,14,15 In addition, volume overload generally decreases the tissue inhibitors of MMP (TIMPs).14,15 Context-specific substrates, such as MMP-2 and TNF and its downstream proteolytic cascade, are the principle targets of MT1-MMP that result in ECM proteolysis, LV dilation, eccentric remodeling, and systolic dysfunction. These proleolytic effects are not limited by increased TIMPs. By contrast, PO causes significant increases in end systolic wall stress with less pronounced changes in end diastolic wall stress.32 These changes in mechanical load lead to not only a increased MT1-MMP, but also a significant increase in TIMPs that act to limit ECM proteolysis.1,14,15 The MT1-MMP–dependent activation of MMP-2 that occurs with PO acts in a concert complex among MMP-2, MT1-MMP, and TIMP-2 to hydrolyze LTBP-1. Thus, PO-induced MT1-MMP induction acts on the context-specific substrate LTBP-1, leading to the activation of TGF and the TGF-dependent profibrotic signaling process. Therefore, differences in biophysical stimuli result in an individualized portfolio of context-specific substrates that allow MT1-MMP to serve as a common mechanism for differential LV remodeling. In addition to profibrotic signaling-induced LV remodeling, selective changes in MMPs, TIMPs, and TGF may induce other pleiotropic effects, such as inflammation, angiogenesis, and apoptosis/autophagy, that may affect LV structural and functional remodeling in response to hemodynamic load.

Other ECM Regulatory Mechanisms

The current study focused specifically on ECM regulatory mechanisms affecting collagen synthesis. However, it is recognized that in addition to synthesis, mechanisms regulating collagen postsynthetic processing and collagen degradation also determine ECM collagen structure, geometry, and content.1,8,14,15,20 For example, PO has been shown to increase TIMPs that may act to limit the effects of MMPs and, therefore, decrease collagen degradation.14,15,50 There is no a priori reason to expect that transgenic MT1-MMP modulation will alter TIMP expression. In addition, TIMPs have poor affinity for MT1-MMP but have a uniformly high affinity for soluble MMPs. Therefore, TIMPs provide potent inhibition to soluble MMPs but do not significantly modify MT1-MMP activity.51,52 Thus, the aggregate effects of PO-induced increased MT1-MMP activity (not blunted by TIMPs) acting on context-specific substrates, such as LTBP-1 and activating downstream TGF profibrotic cascade, result in myocardial fibrosis.

Future Directions

Using transgenic constructs provide the advantage of being able to increase or decrease the expression of a single gene product; in the current experiment, this was specific to MT1-MMP. However, this change in MT1-MMP expression is life long and may result in unintended secondary changes. In addition, the creation of a PO can only be performed in the presence of a permanent condition of increased or decreased MT1-MMP expression. Thus, the change in MT1-MMP expression cannot be limited to only a period during which PO is induced and cannot be changed after PO is complete. Future studies should be designed to address these limitations using a conditional transgenic mouse model in which an inducible construct can be studied. Alternatively, a systemically applied selective inhibitor of MT1-MMP might be used.

In the murine models used in the current study, there are significant limitations in the ability to determine the cause of death and in performing sufficient surveillance to predict cause and occurrence of mortality. Defining cause of death in murine models is exceedingly difficult. Post mortem examinations are often ambiguous. For example, even when post mortem findings of pericardial and pleural effusion suggest increased LV diastolic filling pressures, primary arrhythmic death may have occurred, blurring the distinction between death caused by heart failure versus arrhythmia. Therefore, the cause of death was not formally investigated in this study. However, the time course of changes in LV structure and function that results from PO induced by TAC was carefully defined in a recent study.1 In this study, mice underwent echocardiographic studies at 1, 2, or 4 weeks after PO; at each time point, mice underwent terminal studies, thus serial studies in each individual mouse was not performed. In addition, structural and functional changes measured at 5 to 7 days after PO have not been shown to predict mortality rates or mode of death in this murine model. Therefore, serial imaging studies were not performed in the transgenic mice used in the current study. This is clearly an important area for future studies.

Clinical Implications

The transition from PO-induced remodeling to diastolic dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis represents a pivotal development in the clinical course of hypertensive heart disease and Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) Management strategies for patients with hypertensive heart disease and HFpEF represent a large unmet need and require new directions that target underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Our studies show that the murine model of TAC-induced PO causes changes in LV structure and function that are similar to the structure–function changes in hypertensive heart disease and HFpEF. Therefore, the MT1-MMP–dependent changes in profibrotic signaling represent a clinically relevant causal mechanism that may serve as potential therapeutic targets to prevent or reverse PO-induced adverse ECM remodeling. For example, data from the current study suggest that a decrease in MT1-MMP induction, rather than a complete ablation of MT1-MMP, may be sufficient to modify ECM remodeling in PO. Because MT1-MMP is processed intracellularly by a furin-dependent mechanism and released onto the cell surface as a preactivated MMP form, furin inhibitors, currently being developed for oncological application, may hold promise for patients with hypertensive heart disease and HFpEF.53 Future basic and translational studies should target these therapeutic applications.

Conclusions

PO induction of a unique transmembrane proteolytic enzyme provides a fundamental mechanism influencing the myocardial response to PO. Variations in MT1-MMP did not lead to alterations in the induction of the hypertrophic response to increased stress; however, PO-induced MT1-MMP–dependent profibrotic signaling lead to alterations in interstitial fibrosis and diastolic function. Thus, these data suggest that there is a direct mechanistic relationship between the changes in MT1-MMP and changes in ECM structure and LV diastolic function that occur during PO.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Health grants HL057952, HL089944, HL095608, and Merit Awards from the Veterans’ Affairs Health Administration. Drs Zile and Spinale are supported by the Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Dr Zile is supported by the Research Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs (5101CX000415-02 and 5101BX000487-04).

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

  • Guest Editor for this article was Douglas L. Mann, MD.

  • Received November 14, 2013.
  • Accepted January 2, 2014.
  • © 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Zile MR,
    2. Baicu CF,
    3. Stroud RE,
    4. Van Laer A,
    5. Arroyo J,
    6. Mukherjee R,
    7. Jones JA,
    8. Spinale FG
    . Pressure overload-dependent membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase induction: relationship to LV remodeling and fibrosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012;302:H1429–H1437.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Zile MR,
    2. Gottdiener JS,
    3. Hetzel SJ,
    4. McMurray JJ,
    5. Komajda M,
    6. McKelvie R,
    7. Baicu CF,
    8. Massie BM,
    9. Carson PE
    ; I-PRESERVE Investigators. Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2011;124:2491–2501.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Zile MR,
    2. Baicu CF,
    3. Gaasch WH
    . Diastolic heart failure—abnormalities in active relaxation and passive stiffness of the left ventricle. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1953–1959.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Westermann D,
    2. Kasner M,
    3. Steendijk P,
    4. Spillmann F,
    5. Riad A,
    6. Weitmann K,
    7. Hoffmann W,
    8. Poller W,
    9. Pauschinger M,
    10. Schultheiss HP,
    11. Tschöpe C
    . Role of left ventricular stiffness in heart failure with normal ejection fraction. Circulation. 2008;117:2051–2060.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Weidemann F,
    2. Herrmann S,
    3. Störk S,
    4. Niemann M,
    5. Frantz S,
    6. Lange V,
    7. Beer M,
    8. Gattenlöhner S,
    9. Voelker W,
    10. Ertl G,
    11. Strotmann JM
    . Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120:577–584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Azevedo CF,
    2. Nigri M,
    3. Higuchi ML,
    4. Pomerantzeff PM,
    5. Spina GS,
    6. Sampaio RO,
    7. Tarasoutchi F,
    8. Grinberg M,
    9. Rochitte CE
    . Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis quantification by histopathology and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:278–287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kasner M,
    2. Westermann D,
    3. Lopez B,
    4. Gaub R,
    5. Escher F,
    6. Kühl U,
    7. Schultheiss HP,
    8. Tschöpe C
    . Diastolic tissue Doppler indexes correlate with the degree of collagen expression and cross-linking in heart failure and normal ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:977–985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Baicu CF,
    2. Li J,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Kasiganesan H,
    5. Cooper G 4th.,
    6. Zile MR,
    7. Bradshaw AD
    . Time course of right ventricular pressure-overload induced myocardial fibrosis: relationship to changes in fibroblast postsynthetic procollagen processing. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012;303:H1128–H1134.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Spinale FG
    . Myocardial matrix remodeling and the matrix metalloproteinases: influence on cardiac form and function. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:1285–1342.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Creemers EE,
    2. Pinto YM
    . Molecular mechanisms that control interstitial fibrosis in the pressure-overloaded heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;89:265–272.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Goldsmith EC,
    2. Bradshaw AD,
    3. Spinale FG
    . Cellular mechanisms of tissue fibrosis. 2. Contributory pathways leading to myocardial fibrosis: moving beyond collagen expression. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2013;304:C393–C402.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Iyer RP,
    2. Patterson NL,
    3. Fields GB,
    4. Lindsey ML
    . The history of matrix metalloproteinases: milestones, myths, and misperceptions. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012;303:H919–H930.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Malemud CJ
    . Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in health and disease: an overview. Front Biosci. 2006;11:1696–1701.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Spinale FG,
    2. Janicki JS,
    3. Zile MR
    . Membrane-associated matrix proteolysis and heart failure. Circ Res. 2013;112:195–208.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Spinale FG,
    2. Zile MR
    . Integrating the myocardial matrix into heart failure recognition and management. Circ Res. 2013;113:725–738.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Karsdal MA,
    2. Larsen L,
    3. Engsig MT,
    4. Lou H,
    5. Ferreras M,
    6. Lochter A,
    7. Delaissé JM,
    8. Foged NT
    . Matrix metalloproteinase-dependent activation of latent transforming growth factor-beta controls the conversion of osteoblasts into osteocytes by blocking osteoblast apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:44061–44067.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Spinale FG,
    2. Escobar GP,
    3. Mukherjee R,
    4. Zavadzkas JA,
    5. Saunders SM,
    6. Jeffords LB,
    7. Leone AM,
    8. Beck C,
    9. Bouges S,
    10. Stroud RE
    . Cardiac-restricted overexpression of membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase in mice: effects on myocardial remodeling with aging. Circ Heart Fail. 2009;2:351–360.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Zhou Z,
    2. Apte SS,
    3. Soininen R,
    4. Cao R,
    5. Baaklini GY,
    6. Rauser RW,
    7. Wang J,
    8. Cao Y,
    9. Tryggvason K
    . Impaired endochondral ossification and angiogenesis in mice deficient in membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:4052–4057.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Zavadzkas JA,
    2. Mukherjee R,
    3. Rivers WT,
    4. Patel RK,
    5. Meyer EC,
    6. Black LE,
    7. McKinney RA,
    8. Oelsen JM,
    9. Stroud RE,
    10. Spinale FG
    . Direct regulation of membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase following myocardial infarction causes changes in survival, cardiac function, and remodeling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;301:H1656–H1666.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Bradshaw AD,
    2. Baicu CF,
    3. Rentz TJ,
    4. Van Laer AO,
    5. Boggs J,
    6. Lacy JM,
    7. Zile MR
    . Pressure overload-induced alterations in fibrillar collagen content and myocardial diastolic function: role of secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) in post-synthetic procollagen processing. Circulation. 2009;119:269–280.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Lang RM,
    2. Bierig M,
    3. Devereux RB,
    4. Flachskampf FA,
    5. Foster E,
    6. Pellikka PA,
    7. Picard MH,
    8. Roman MJ,
    9. Seward J,
    10. Shanewise JS,
    11. Solomon SD,
    12. Spencer KT,
    13. John Sutton M,
    14. Stewart WJ
    . Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a Branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:1440–1463.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lam CS,
    2. Roger VL,
    3. Rodeheffer RJ,
    4. Bursi F,
    5. Borlaug BA,
    6. Ommen SR,
    7. Kass DA,
    8. Redfield MM
    . Cardiac structure and ventricular-vascular function in persons with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction from Olmsted County, Minnesota. Circulation. 2007;115:1982–1990.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Melenovsky V,
    2. Borlaug BA,
    3. Rosen B,
    4. Hay I,
    5. Ferruci L,
    6. Morell CH,
    7. Lakatta EG,
    8. Najjar SS,
    9. Kass DA
    . Cardiovascular features of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction versus nonfailing hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy in the urban Baltimore community: the role of atrial remodeling/dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:198–207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Blom AS,
    2. Mukherjee R,
    3. Pilla JJ,
    4. Lowry AS,
    5. Yarbrough WM,
    6. Mingoia JT,
    7. Hendrick JW,
    8. Stroud RE,
    9. McLean JE,
    10. Affuso J,
    11. Gorman RC,
    12. Gorman JH 3rd.,
    13. Acker MA,
    14. Spinale FG
    . Cardiac support device modifies left ventricular geometry and myocardial structure after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2005;112:1274–1283.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Deschamps AM,
    2. Yarbrough WM,
    3. Squires CE,
    4. Allen RA,
    5. McClister DM,
    6. Dowdy KB,
    7. McLean JE,
    8. Mingoia JT,
    9. Sample JA,
    10. Mukherjee R,
    11. Spinale FG
    . Trafficking of the membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase in ischemia and reperfusion: relation to interstitial membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase activity. Circulation. 2005;111:1166–1174.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Dixon JA,
    2. Gaillard WF 2nd.,
    3. Rivers WT,
    4. Koval CN,
    5. Stroud RE,
    6. Mukherjee R,
    7. Spinale FG
    . Heterogeneity in MT1-MMP activity with ischemia-reperfusion and previous myocardial infarction: relation to regional myocardial function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;299:H1947–H1958.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Spinale FG,
    2. Mukherjee R,
    3. Zavadzkas JA,
    4. Koval CN,
    5. Bouges S,
    6. Stroud RE,
    7. Dobrucki LW,
    8. Sinusas AJ
    . Cardiac restricted overexpression of membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase causes adverse myocardial remodeling following myocardial infarction. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:30316–30327.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Ruddy JM,
    2. Jones JA,
    3. Stroud RE,
    4. Mukherjee R,
    5. Spinale FG,
    6. Ikonomidis JS
    . Differential effects of mechanical and biological stimuli on matrix metalloproteinase promoter activation in the thoracic aorta. Circulation. 2009;120(suppl 11):S262–S268.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. van Heerebeek L,
    2. Franssen CP,
    3. Hamdani N,
    4. Verheugt FW,
    5. Somsen GA,
    6. Paulus WJ
    . Molecular and cellular basis for diastolic dysfunction. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2012;9:293–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hamdani N,
    2. Paulus WJ
    . Myocardial titin and collagen in cardiac diastolic dysfunction: partners in crime. Circulation. 2013;128:5–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Mann DL
    1. Zile MR,
    2. Baicu CF
    . Alterations in ventricular function: diastolic heart failure, Chapter 14. In:Mann DL Heart Failure: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier;2010.
  32. 32.↵
    1. Gaasch WH,
    2. Zile MR
    . Left ventricular structural remodeling in health and disease: with special emphasis on volume, mass, and geometry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1733–1740.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Villar AV,
    2. García R,
    3. Llano M,
    4. Cobo M,
    5. Merino D,
    6. Lantero A,
    7. Tramullas M,
    8. Hurlé JM,
    9. Hurlé MA,
    10. Nistal JF
    . BAMBI (BMP and activin membrane-bound inhibitor) protects the murine heart from pressure-overload biomechanical stress by restraining TGF-β signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1832:323–335.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Dobaczewski M,
    2. Chen W,
    3. Frangogiannis NG
    . Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling in cardiac remodeling. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2011;51:600–606.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Villar AV,
    2. Cobo M,
    3. Llano M,
    4. Montalvo C,
    5. González-Vílchez F,
    6. Martín-Durán R,
    7. Hurlé MA,
    8. Nistal JF
    . Plasma levels of transforming growth factor-beta1 reflect left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis. PLoS One. 2009;4:e8476.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Gordon KJ,
    2. Blobe GC
    . Role of transforming growth factor-beta superfamily signaling pathways in human disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1782:197–228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Bjørnstad JL,
    2. Skrbic B,
    3. Marstein HS,
    4. Hasic A,
    5. Sjaastad I,
    6. Louch WE,
    7. Florholmen G,
    8. Christensen G,
    9. Tønnessen T
    . Inhibition of SMAD2 phosphorylation preserves cardiac function during pressure overload. Cardiovasc Res. 2012;93:100–110.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Bujak M,
    2. Ren G,
    3. Kweon HJ,
    4. Dobaczewski M,
    5. Reddy A,
    6. Taffet G,
    7. Wang XF,
    8. Frangogiannis NG
    . Essential role of Smad3 in infarct healing and in the pathogenesis of cardiac remodeling. Circulation. 2007;116:2127–2138.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Koshikawa N,
    2. Minegishi T,
    3. Sharabi A,
    4. Quaranta V,
    5. Seiki M
    . Membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MT1-MMP) is a processing enzyme for human laminin gamma 2 chain. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:88–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Kridel SJ,
    2. Sawai H,
    3. Ratnikov BI,
    4. Chen EI,
    5. Li W,
    6. Godzik A,
    7. Strongin AY,
    8. Smith JW
    . A unique substrate binding mode discriminates membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase from other matrix metalloproteinases. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:23788–23793.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Kudo T,
    2. Takino T,
    3. Miyamori H,
    4. Thompson EW,
    5. Sato H
    . Substrate choice of membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase is dictated by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 levels. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:563–568.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Newby AC
    . Matrix metalloproteinases regulate migration, proliferation, and death of vascular smooth muscle cells by degrading matrix and non-matrix substrates. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;69:614–624.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Ohuchi E,
    2. Imai K,
    3. Fujii Y,
    4. Sato H,
    5. Seiki M,
    6. Okada Y
    . Membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase digests interstitial collagens and other extracellular matrix macromolecules. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:2446–2451.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Williams LM,
    2. Gibbons DL,
    3. Gearing A,
    4. Maini RN,
    5. Feldmann M,
    6. Brennan FM
    . Paradoxical effects of a synthetic metalloproteinase inhibitor that blocks both p55 and p75 TNF receptor shedding and TNF alpha processing in RA synovial membrane cell cultures. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:2833–2841.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Guo C,
    2. Piacentini L
    . Type I collagen-induced MMP-2 activation coincides with up-regulation of membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase and TIMP-2 in cardiac fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:46699–46708.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Dallas SL,
    2. Rosser JL,
    3. Mundy GR,
    4. Bonewald LF
    . Proteolysis of latent transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta)-binding protein-1 by osteoclasts. A cellular mechanism for release of TGF-beta from bone matrix. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:21352–21360.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Tatti O,
    2. Vehviläinen P,
    3. Lehti K,
    4. Keski-Oja J
    . MT1-MMP releases latent TGF-beta1 from endothelial cell extracellular matrix via proteolytic processing of LTBP-1. Exp Cell Res. 2008;314:2501–2514.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Hawinkels LJ,
    2. Kuiper P,
    3. Wiercinska E,
    4. Verspaget HW,
    5. Liu Z,
    6. Pardali E,
    7. Sier CF,
    8. ten Dijke P
    . Matrix metalloproteinase-14 (MT1-MMP)-mediated endoglin shedding inhibits tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2010;70:4141–4150.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Koitabashi N,
    2. Danner T,
    3. Zaiman AL,
    4. Pinto YM,
    5. Rowell J,
    6. Mankowski J,
    7. Zhang D,
    8. Nakamura T,
    9. Takimoto E,
    10. Kass DA,
    11. Koitabashi N,
    12. Danner T,
    13. Zaiman AL,
    14. Pinto YM,
    15. Rowell J,
    16. Mankowski J,
    17. Zhang D,
    18. Nakamura T,
    19. Takimoto E,
    20. Kass DA
    . Pivotal role of cardiomyocyte TGF-beta signaling in the murine pathological response to sustained pressure overload. J Clin Invest. 2011; 121:2301–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Polyakova V,
    2. Hein S,
    3. Kostin S,
    4. Ziegelhoeffer T,
    5. Schaper J
    . Matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in pressure-overloaded human myocardium during heart failure progression. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1609–1618.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Zhao H,
    2. Bernardo MM,
    3. Osenkowski P,
    4. Sohail A,
    5. Pei D,
    6. Nagase H,
    7. Kashiwagi M,
    8. Soloway PD,
    9. DeClerck YA,
    10. Fridman R
    . Differential inhibition of membrane type 3 (MT3)-matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and MT1-MMP by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-2 and TIMP-3 rgulates pro-MMP-2 activation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:8592–8601.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Gomez DE,
    2. Alonso DF,
    3. Yoshiji H,
    4. Thorgeirsson UP
    . Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: structure, regulation and biological functions. Eur J Cell Biol. 1997;74:111–122.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Coppola JM,
    2. Bhojani MS,
    3. Ross BD,
    4. Rehemtulla A
    . A small-molecule furin inhibitor inhibits cancer cell motility and invasiveness. Neoplasia. 2008;10:363–370.
    OpenUrlPubMed

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

The transition from pressure overload (PO)–induced remodeling to diastolic dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis represents a pivotal development in the clinical course of hypertensive heart disease and HFpEF. Management strategies for patients with hypertensive heart disease and HFpEF represent a large unmet need and require new directions that target underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Our studies showed that the murine model of transverse aortic constriction–induced PO causes changes in LV structure and function that are similar to the structure–function changes in hypertensive heart disease and HFpEF. In the current study, data suggest that PO-induced membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP)–dependent profibrotic signaling lead to alterations in interstitial fibrosis and diastolic function and that there is a direct mechanistic relationship between the changes in MT1-MMP and changes in extracellular matrix structure and LV diastolic function that occur during PO. Therefore, the MT1-MMP–dependent changes in profibrotic signaling represent a clinically relevant causal mechanism that may serve as potential therapeutic targets to prevent or reverse PO-induced adverse extracellular matrix remodeling. For example, data from the current study suggest that a decrease in MT1-MMP induction, rather than a complete ablation of MT1-MMP, may be sufficient to modify extracellular matrix remodeling in PO. Because MT1-MMP is processed intracellularly by a furin-dependent mechanism and released onto the cell surface as a preactivated MMP form, furin inhibitors, currently being developed for oncological application, may hold promise for patients with hypertensive heart disease and HFpEF. Future basic and translational studies should target these therapeutic applications.

View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

This Issue

Circulation: Heart Failure
March 2014, Volume 7, Issue 2
  • Table of Contents
Previous ArticleNext Article

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Sources of Funding
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters

Article Tools

  • Print
  • Citation Tools
    Mechanistic Relationship Between Membrane Type-1 Matrix Metalloproteinase and the Myocardial Response to Pressure OverloadCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
    Michael R. Zile, Catalin F. Baicu, Robert E. Stroud, An O. Van Laer, Jeffrey A. Jones, Risha Patel, Rupak Mukherjee and Francis G. Spinale
    Circulation: Heart Failure. 2014;7:340-350, originally published March 18, 2014
    https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000984

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
  •  Download Powerpoint
  • Article Alerts
    Log in to Email Alerts with your email address.
  • Save to my folders

Share this Article

  • Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Circulation: Heart Failure.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Mechanistic Relationship Between Membrane Type-1 Matrix Metalloproteinase and the Myocardial Response to Pressure OverloadCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from Circulation: Heart Failure
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the Circulation: Heart Failure web site.
  • Share on Social Media
    Mechanistic Relationship Between Membrane Type-1 Matrix Metalloproteinase and the Myocardial Response to Pressure OverloadCLINICAL PERSPECTIVE
    Michael R. Zile, Catalin F. Baicu, Robert E. Stroud, An O. Van Laer, Jeffrey A. Jones, Risha Patel, Rupak Mukherjee and Francis G. Spinale
    Circulation: Heart Failure. 2014;7:340-350, originally published March 18, 2014
    https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000984
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Related Articles

Cited By...

Subjects

  • Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research
    • Myocardial Biology
  • Genetics
    • Gene Expression & Regulation
  • Heart Failure and Cardiac Disease
    • Hypertrophy
    • Remodeling
    • Congenital Heart Disease

Circulation: Heart Failure

  • About Circulation: Heart Failure
  • Instructions for Authors
  • AHA CME
  • Guidelines and Statements
  • Permissions
  • Journal Policies
  • Email Alerts
  • Open Access Information
  • AHA Journals RSS
  • AHA Newsroom

Editorial Office Address:
200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1020
Waltham, MA 02451 
email: circ@circulationjournal.org

Information for:
  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Subscriber Help
  • Institutions / Librarians
  • Institutional Subscriptions FAQ
  • International Users
American Heart Association Learn and Live
National Center
7272 Greenville Ave.
Dallas, TX 75231

Customer Service

  • 1-800-AHA-USA-1
  • 1-800-242-8721
  • Local Info
  • Contact Us

About Us

Our mission is to build healthier lives, free of cardiovascular diseases and stroke. That single purpose drives all we do. The need for our work is beyond question. Find Out More about the American Heart Association

  • Careers
  • SHOP
  • Latest Heart and Stroke News
  • AHA/ASA Media Newsroom

Our Sites

  • American Heart Association
  • American Stroke Association
  • For Professionals
  • More Sites

Take Action

  • Advocate
  • Donate
  • Planned Giving
  • Volunteer
  • You're the Cure

Online Communities

  • AFib Support
  • Empowered to Serve
  • Garden Community
  • Patient Support Network
  • Professional Online Network

Follow Us:

  • Follow Circulation on Twitter
  • Visit Circulation on Facebook
  • Follow Circulation on Google Plus
  • Follow Circulation on Instagram
  • Follow Circulation on Pinterest
  • Follow Circulation on YouTube
  • Rss Feeds
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Ethics Policy
  • Conflict of Interest Policy
  • Linking Policy
  • Diversity
  • Careers

©2018 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. The American Heart Association is a qualified 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization.
*Red Dress™ DHHS, Go Red™ AHA; National Wear Red Day ® is a registered trademark.

  • PUTTING PATIENTS FIRST National Health Council Standards of Excellence Certification Program
  • BBB Accredited Charity
  • Comodo Secured