This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Drazner, M. H. Articles by Nohria, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Drazner, M. H. Articles by Nohria, A. Related Collections Other heart failure Other diagnostic testing Congestive

Original Articles

Value of Clinician Assessment of Hemodynamics in Advanced Heart Failure

The ESCAPE Trial

Mark H. Drazner, MD, MSc; Anne S. Hellkamp, MS; Carl V. Leier, MD; Monica R. Shah, MD, MHS, MSJ; Leslie W. Miller, MD; Stuart D. Russell, MD; James B. Young, MD; Robert M. Califf, MD and Anju Nohria, MD

From the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (M.H.D.), Dallas ; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center (A.S.H., R.M.C.), Durham, NC ; The Ohio State University Medical Center (C.V.L.), Columbus ; Washington Hospital Center (M.R.S.), Washington, DC; Brigham and Women’s Hospital (A.N.), Boston, Mass; Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University Hospital (L.W.M.), Washington, DC; Johns Hopkins Hospital (S.D.R.), Baltimore, Md; and Cleveland Clinic Foundation (J.B.Y.), Ohio.

Correspondence to Mark H. Drazner, MD, MSc, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9047. E-mail mark.drazner{at}utsouthwestern.edu

Received December 6, 2007; accepted July 23, 2008.

Background— We determined whether estimated hemodynamics from history and physical examination (H&P) reflect invasive measurements and predict outcomes in advanced heart failure. The role of the H&P in medical decision making has declined in favor of diagnostic tests, perhaps because of the lack of evidence for utility.

Methods and Results— We compared H&P estimates of filling pressures and cardiac index with invasive measurements in 194 patients in the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) trial. H&P estimates were compared with 6-month outcomes in 388 patients enrolled in ESCAPE. Measured right atrial pressure was <8 mm Hg in 82% of patients with right atrial pressure estimated from jugular veins as <8 mm Hg, and was >12 mm Hg in 70% of patients when estimated as >12 mm Hg. From the H&P, only estimated right atrial pressure 12 mm Hg (odds ratio, 4.6; P<0.001) and orthopnea 2 pillows (odds ratio, 3.6; P<0.05) were associated with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 30 mm Hg. Estimated cardiac index did not reliably reflect the measured cardiac index (P=0.09), but "cold" versus "warm" profile was associated with lower median measured cardiac index (1.75 versus 2.0 L/(min·m²); P=0.004). In Cox regression analysis, discharge "cold" or "wet" profile conveyed a 50% increased risk of death or rehospitalization.

Conclusions— In advanced heart failure, the presence of orthopnea and increased jugular venous pressure is useful to detect increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and a global assessment of inadequate perfusion ("cold" profile) is useful to detect reduced cardiac index. Hemodynamic profiles estimated from the discharge H&P identify patients at increased risk of early events.

Key Words: diagnosis • heart failure • hemodynamics • history and physical examination

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Palardy, L. W. Stevenson, G. Tasissa, M. A. Hamilton, R. C. Bourge, T. G. DiSalvo, U. Elkayam, J. A. Hill, S. C. Reimold, and for the ESCAPE Investigators Reduction in Mitral Regurgitation During Therapy Guided by Measured Filling Pressures in the ESCAPE Trial Circ Heart Fail, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 181 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]